- Joined
- Sep 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,556
- Reaction score
- 134
Seriously, people ranking Nate as one of the top LWs when he hasn't won at LW in 4 years.
Reasons cited include beating Cerrone 8 years ago and beating a FW at WW (Pettis).
Nate is 2-3 at LW in the past 7 years.
Nate is not a top lightweight. Period.
This is not fighter-bashing--Nate is a good fighter who had a great run at LW about 7 to 8 years ago, but the fact is he is not currently deserving of a high ranking at LW.
For further information, please review the lightweight rankings which do not include his name.
Reasons cited include beating Cerrone 8 years ago and beating a FW at WW (Pettis).
Nate is 2-3 at LW in the past 7 years.
Nate is not a top lightweight. Period.
This is not fighter-bashing--Nate is a good fighter who had a great run at LW about 7 to 8 years ago, but the fact is he is not currently deserving of a high ranking at LW.
For further information, please review the lightweight rankings which do not include his name.