Has any other fighter pissed hot twice and have the second test excused as being trace remains?

W

wake_me

Black Belt
@Black
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
5,936
Reaction score
124
cant think of this happening before. has any other fighter popped for the same substance in a 2 year span?
 
No fighter.

Ariel posted some examples of NCAA athletes with somewhat similar cases.
 
they are calling it pulsing.

so a drunk driver can keep drinking and driving forever and when ever he gets pulled over and tested he can say is pulsing. lol. such a joke.
 
kennysux said:
they are calling it pulsing.

so a drunk driver can keep drinking and driving forever and when ever he gets pulled over and tested he can say is pulsing. lol. such a joke.
Click to expand...

Hey Kenny,

Sounds suspect. i wonder if they sourced any scientific literature.
 
source.gif
 
Unprecedented. But a fighter has never snitched on himself to get a reduced sentence either. Because of his confidential confession, USADA is confident in knowing exactly what is going on with his past PED use and that he is continuing to fail for the same violation. Since he already served his suspension, they aren't going to impose another one. It's like double jeopardy - you can't be charged twice for the same crime.

With that said, I don't agree with any of it, but I think that's what's going on.
 
jeff-novitzky-1181848.jpg

Listen up ya goofs. Jon Jones's positive test is not a positive test. It's a non purposeful ingestion that is not a violation because we consider it pulsing. It's pulsing see ? Glad we could clear that up.
 
Threetrees said:
No fighter.

Ariel posted some examples of NCAA athletes with somewhat similar cases.
Click to expand...
the cases similar to jones I read were of an athlete who did steroids following shoulder surgery, and those steroids stuck for 3 years in her blood tests. this was all documented and the athlete did all she could physically to get rid of remainings of the substance.

the other athlete was found with remains that were scientifically "minuscule", of a substance he was caught with years ago and took it unwillingly.

The similarity of these cases with Jones is just in the sense of steroids sticking in the system and appearing in later tests. so not the same drug and completely different circumstances.
 
He should be an extra on any up coming Star Trek movie

Ling Ling said:
jeff-novitzky-1181848.jpg

Listen up ya goofs. Jon Jones's positive test is not a positive test. It's a non purposeful ingestion that is not a violation because we consider it pulsing. It's pulsing see ? Glad we could clear that up.
Click to expand...
 
basementdweller said:
the cases similar to jones I read were of an athlete who did steroids following shoulder surgery, and those steroids stuck for 3 years in her blood tests. this was all documented and the athlete did all she could physically to get rid of remainings of the substance.

the other athlete was found with remains that were scientifically "minuscule", of a substance he was caught with years ago and took it unwillingly.

The similarity of these cases with Jones is just in the sense of steroids sticking in the system and appearing in later tests. so not the same drug and completely different circumstances.
Click to expand...

And let me guess, you don´t know the name of the athlete or have a link to the story?
 
If someone gets busted for using a PED, all he has to do is use the exact same stuff the next time and BAM, cleared without having to completely cycle it off.

What a shitload of fuck.
 
QcChopper said:
If someone gets busted for using a PED, all he has to do is use the exact same stuff the next time and BAM, cleared without having to completely cycle it off.

What a shitload of fuck.
Click to expand...
from what I understood, they have a way to determine Jones didn't take the drug recently, which is why they're ruling it like that. I'm guessing they're choosing to interpret it that way so the event isn't destroyed, but that's the game. of course they're playing favorites, but that doesn't mean Jones is guilty (this time).
 
basementdweller said:
from what I understood, they have a way to determine Jones didn't take the drug recently, which is why they're ruling it like that. I'm guessing they're choosing to interpret it that way so the event isn't destroyed, but that's the game. of course they're playing favorites, but that doesn't mean Jones is guilty (this time).
Click to expand...

but wasnt the amount in
his system in the same range as 15 months ago
 
Threetrees said:
No fighter.

Ariel posted some examples of NCAA athletes with somewhat similar cases.
Click to expand...
None of those cases have the same substance (or same metabolite) as Jones’ case and while those are quite interesting stories, you can’t put much weight on those.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,263,608
Messages
57,234,522
Members
175,599
Latest member
Petey_My_Heart

Share this page

Back
Top