So in defence of Georges, you're now going to argue that the result of the Diaz fight was subjective, and should therefore not count as a loss?
Or are you just repeating what I said without actually knowing what the word means?
No shit, tons of things are subjective in MMA. People watch for different reasons. If Silva fans are content with him beating nobodies because he can do it in flashy fashion, I can see that argument. I don't see however an argument where a win streak automatically equals a pound for pound status.
It equals a pound for pound status because once Georges fans like you take your heads out of your ass, you'll see that Anderson isn't beating nobodies, but great fighters.
And before we move on, by nobodies, do you mean that they're cans?
and No, I DO think Anderson is an A+ fighter. Just one that has wasted his career worse than any other fighter. Even if that has to do a lot with circumstance. Many have made the same observation.
Yeah... I've heard that argument before and it comes from the same type of people.
Oh... Anderson is great, he just has to do what no fighter has ever done, and move up two weight classes from WW, to prove his potential.
You know how many weigh classes Georges has moved up? Zero.
Anderson? Two.
Yet, these fighters are held to such different standards, that you're here defending Georges for fighting against a fighter who lost his last fight, while criticizing Anderson, not for defending his title against someone who lost his last fight. Not because he hasn't moved up a weight class. Not because he hasn't moved up two weight classes. But because he's not fighting the champ two weight classes above the one he started in.
You know how ridiculous that is?
I'm going to move on because you guys are beyond delusional.