Uh no. Even with round by round scoring, he should’ve lost. Hendricks was more effective and inflicted more damage in the 1st round.
This is why, I can't respect GSP....The dude is full of shit...We all know Hendricks kicked his ass and was his toughest opponent...Perhaps Hendricks wasn't as skilled as BJ and he didn't land a great head kick as Condit, but Hendricks was a way worse match up for him than all other fighters he ever faced...Also Hendricks was way more durable than bisping.
GSP comes off as a sore loser, even though he won, it just seems that he doesn't want to give hendricks any credit because fans might think that he is admitting that Hendricks won, which most MMA media/Fans think.
I know people are gonna say "but but Hendricks was on roids"...There is no prove, and also LMFAO if you think GSP was natty.
And Overeem wore a drug free t-shirt. You can believe what you want. It's damn obvious though. Most guys don't get caught.
There seeems to be a tendency for people to say well Hendricks won his rounds doing more damage, or did more damage over the course of the fight. Look at their faces etc.And the funny thing that people don't seem to get is that if GSP didn't win, it was a draw at worst. In which case he still keeps the belt and Hendricks fans still get butt hurt over it.
Bj was the better fighter but bisping was more durable.BJ was the toughest fight but Bisping was the toughest opponent?
That sounds weird.