- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 8,108
- Reaction score
- 628
I do think that theory is correct for explaining the history of modern society.
I just don't agree with Clovis first.
I give this theory credence because it does answer some questions, no one else seems to be able to explain, like why we see the 3rd eye in cultures around the world in what we once thought was the first societies. Very few theories could explain that, just as very few theories can explain that Denisovan bracelet.
Perhaps there are other explanations we just haven't found yet, but I find his explanations very compelling.
I know the issue of the Denisovan bracelet is very narrow, but would you agree that Hancock's theory should be considered the leading theory as of now, to explain the existence of that bracelet?
what culture has the first mention of the third eye ?