- Joined
- Jun 3, 2009
- Messages
- 85,564
- Reaction score
- 20,799
Update: July 15, 2016
Dragonlord's Review of GHOSTBUSTERS (No Spoilers)
From the moment they announced that Ghostbusters was undergoing a reboot but this time with four women as the lead characters, the negative reaction was overwhelming. The negativity went into overdrive after the underwhelming first trailer debut.
I'm sure you can nitpick and over-analyze scenes propagating feminism and whatnot but I'm just going to discuss the merits of the movie only.
The story is a retread of the original, revisiting many of the narrative structure from the 1984 film. There's nothing wrong with that as the story about a bunch of lovable losers whom are ridiculed by the public ends saving the day never gets old. The problem is most of the jokes are not funny and characters often behave in an off-putting manner. The dialogue felt like they're ad-libbed and some of the scenes resembled an improv, which are the norm for a Paul Feig film, but it just fell flat in here.
Melissa Mccarthy, who usually plays a loud, obnoxious character in her other movies, turns out to be the most likable among the team. Leslie Jones thankfully didn't channel her booming, abrasive, unpleasant, predatory Saturday Night Live persona and was fairly likable in the film. Kristen Wiig was pretty decent. Kate McKinnon was the "worst" among the girls, often acting in a forced wacky manner and talking balderdash just to try to get a cheap laugh. But due to her charm and being extremely telegenic in here, she gets away with it somewhat.
Chris Hemsworth was terrible as the hunky but dumb secretary. At first his schtick was humorous but it quickly gets old and I just ended up being annoyed with the cartoonish character. They overdid it by making him to be the stupidest guy in the world. Was hoping for a redeeming moment for the character but there was none.
The VFX were great and the ghost effects were a vast improvement over the original films, naturally. The gadgets were cool. Some of the action scenes at the finale was pretty good. The cameos by the original cast members were enjoyable but could have been written better.
Overall, Ghostbusters was disappointing since the potential was there if it was just written better. Having directed the hilarious R-rated Bridesmaids and Spy and the somewhat funny The Heat, I felt Paul Feig lost a lot of his edge due to the PG-13 family friendly restriction in here.
Rating: 5/10
____________________________________________________
Update: August 10, 2016
GHOSTBUSTERS Heading for $70 Million-Plus Loss, Sequel Now Unlikely
Immediately upon the opening of Ghostbusters in mid-July, top Sony executives boldly declared a sequel to Paul Feig's all-female reboot of Ivan Reitman's 1984 classic was a given. "While nothing has been officially announced yet, there's no doubt in my mind it will happen," said RoryBruer, president of worldwide distribution at Sony.
That was the studio's last public mention of a sequel. As of Aug. 7, Ghostbusters had earned just under $180 million at the global box office, including $117 million domestic. The film still hasn't opened in a few markets, including France, Japan and Mexico, but box-office experts say it will have trouble getting to $225 million despite a hefty net production budget of $144 million plus a big marketing spend. The studio has said break-even would be $300 million.
Sony hardly is alone in suffering from audience rejection of sequels this summer. But film chief TomRothman and his team, along with partner Village Roadshow, had high hopes for launching a live-action Ghostbusters "universe." Now they are preparing for steep losses (think $70 million-plus) and an uncertain future for the franchise.
Sony won't comment on whether it has banished a sequel to the netherworld, but perhaps tellingly, a rep says the studio actively is pursuing an animated Ghostbusters feature that could hit theaters in 2019 and an animated TV series, Ghostbusters: Ecto Force, which is eyeing an early 2018 bow. Both are being guided by Reitman, who firmly is back in charge of the Ghostbusters empire via Ghost Corps., a subsidiary with a mandate to expand the brand across platforms. (It was former Sony film chief AmyPascalwho first embraced Feig's vision for the live-action reboot, not Reitman or Rothman.)
"Ghostbusters is on ice until further notice," says box-office analyst JeffBock. "I just can't fathom the creative talents behind it — Feig, McCarthy, Wiig, etc. — slogging out another one when the reception to the first one was so mediocre."
'Ghostbusters' Heading for $70 Million-Plus Loss, Sequel Now Unlikely
Link to previous Ghostbusters thread: http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/117304189/
Dragonlord's Review of GHOSTBUSTERS (No Spoilers)
From the moment they announced that Ghostbusters was undergoing a reboot but this time with four women as the lead characters, the negative reaction was overwhelming. The negativity went into overdrive after the underwhelming first trailer debut.
I'm sure you can nitpick and over-analyze scenes propagating feminism and whatnot but I'm just going to discuss the merits of the movie only.
The story is a retread of the original, revisiting many of the narrative structure from the 1984 film. There's nothing wrong with that as the story about a bunch of lovable losers whom are ridiculed by the public ends saving the day never gets old. The problem is most of the jokes are not funny and characters often behave in an off-putting manner. The dialogue felt like they're ad-libbed and some of the scenes resembled an improv, which are the norm for a Paul Feig film, but it just fell flat in here.
Melissa Mccarthy, who usually plays a loud, obnoxious character in her other movies, turns out to be the most likable among the team. Leslie Jones thankfully didn't channel her booming, abrasive, unpleasant, predatory Saturday Night Live persona and was fairly likable in the film. Kristen Wiig was pretty decent. Kate McKinnon was the "worst" among the girls, often acting in a forced wacky manner and talking balderdash just to try to get a cheap laugh. But due to her charm and being extremely telegenic in here, she gets away with it somewhat.
Chris Hemsworth was terrible as the hunky but dumb secretary. At first his schtick was humorous but it quickly gets old and I just ended up being annoyed with the cartoonish character. They overdid it by making him to be the stupidest guy in the world. Was hoping for a redeeming moment for the character but there was none.
The VFX were great and the ghost effects were a vast improvement over the original films, naturally. The gadgets were cool. Some of the action scenes at the finale was pretty good. The cameos by the original cast members were enjoyable but could have been written better.
Overall, Ghostbusters was disappointing since the potential was there if it was just written better. Having directed the hilarious R-rated Bridesmaids and Spy and the somewhat funny The Heat, I felt Paul Feig lost a lot of his edge due to the PG-13 family friendly restriction in here.
Rating: 5/10
____________________________________________________
Update: August 10, 2016
GHOSTBUSTERS Heading for $70 Million-Plus Loss, Sequel Now Unlikely
Immediately upon the opening of Ghostbusters in mid-July, top Sony executives boldly declared a sequel to Paul Feig's all-female reboot of Ivan Reitman's 1984 classic was a given. "While nothing has been officially announced yet, there's no doubt in my mind it will happen," said RoryBruer, president of worldwide distribution at Sony.
That was the studio's last public mention of a sequel. As of Aug. 7, Ghostbusters had earned just under $180 million at the global box office, including $117 million domestic. The film still hasn't opened in a few markets, including France, Japan and Mexico, but box-office experts say it will have trouble getting to $225 million despite a hefty net production budget of $144 million plus a big marketing spend. The studio has said break-even would be $300 million.
Sony hardly is alone in suffering from audience rejection of sequels this summer. But film chief TomRothman and his team, along with partner Village Roadshow, had high hopes for launching a live-action Ghostbusters "universe." Now they are preparing for steep losses (think $70 million-plus) and an uncertain future for the franchise.
Sony won't comment on whether it has banished a sequel to the netherworld, but perhaps tellingly, a rep says the studio actively is pursuing an animated Ghostbusters feature that could hit theaters in 2019 and an animated TV series, Ghostbusters: Ecto Force, which is eyeing an early 2018 bow. Both are being guided by Reitman, who firmly is back in charge of the Ghostbusters empire via Ghost Corps., a subsidiary with a mandate to expand the brand across platforms. (It was former Sony film chief AmyPascalwho first embraced Feig's vision for the live-action reboot, not Reitman or Rothman.)
"Ghostbusters is on ice until further notice," says box-office analyst JeffBock. "I just can't fathom the creative talents behind it — Feig, McCarthy, Wiig, etc. — slogging out another one when the reception to the first one was so mediocre."
'Ghostbusters' Heading for $70 Million-Plus Loss, Sequel Now Unlikely
Link to previous Ghostbusters thread: http://forums.sherdog.com/posts/117304189/
Last edited: