My main issue with you is that you think mousasi is like remotely better than bisping ( correct me if I'm off with that [ your opinion] ) ....that's just funny and this is one instance WHERE YOU CAN APPLY MMA MATH due to the common opponents ,the same time line they fought them within and their predominant standing styles. Other than that- mousasi aside - I acknowledge u a decent poster.
Thanks man, and we both stick to our people, never going to change. I think we agree on other topics if memory serves me correct? I think Moose is more than mildly better than Bisping, but not light years ahead of him. I've admitted this much before. I would have liked to see that fight happen, and think it would have been a good one, and my opinion is that it wouldn't have been an easy fight for Moose, like a lot of his fans think. Can you tell me that you are 100% sure that Moose would decimate Bisping and there's not a chance Bisping would out-gastank him / out-volume him, never let him get started? I just never saw it as a total destruction and gave Bisping a chance, just my opinion.
If your point with the MMA math is a Moose vs Bisping thing then yeah, you are correct. Is that really a good thing for Moose? Anybody could have taken Bisping out at that time and it wouldn't have been considered a big accomplishment.
But... more importantly, and please read this part, it looks like anybody could have taken out anybody at that point. To compare it to economics... that MW division, in retrospect, was like a booming economy, stock market was soaring, toxic loans were being passed out, everybody thought it looked great, then it got to the point where the bubble burst, and Bisping was like the correction that brought it back to normal, maybe even started a recession.
Moose didn't even fight, or beat the best people in THAT division.
Moose has fans that get straight up shitty with other people and swear he is #2, which is fine, part of me appreciates the underdoggedness of this claim and wants it to be true. But my issue, and the reason I can't justify it, is there is no proof other than "he could have", and he has a massive record. Doesn't matter to me that he "would have been champ".
Then they shit on the UFC and say organizations don't matter. I hate that the UFC has monopolized that game, and I wish organizations didn't matter, and I miss the old days when the top 10 for each division had guys from a few different organizations, and there was more mystique. You'd remember this shit, but at one point you had ranked guys in UFC, Affliction, WEC, Elite XC, .... but it hasn't been that way for a long time.
I just hold him slightly lower than you do. I'm saying this respectfully, and think you're a good poster too and respect your loyalty to your favorite fighter.