fullerene said:Alexander Medved - FILA Greatest Wrestler of 20th Century (Freestyle)
Alexander Karelin - FILA Greatest Wrestler of 20th Century (Greco-Roman)
mepersoner said:I think it's pretty accepted that Karelin was the most dominant wrestler ever, but that even though Gable may have been also very dominant, what really makes him "better" than a lot of other equally good wrestlers was his dominating performance as a wrestling COACH afterwards. Dominating wreslter and wrestling coatch = best ever?
John Smith should be there as well then. He has 6 world titles, including 2 olympic gold medals, and is a very successful head coach at Oklahoma State.mepersoner said:I think it's pretty accepted that Karelin was the most dominant wrestler ever, but that even though Gable may have been also very dominant, what really makes him "better" than a lot of other equally good wrestlers was his dominating performance as a wrestling COACH afterwards. Dominating wreslter and wrestling coatch = best ever?
CoutureFighter said:John Smith should be there as well then. He has 6 world titles, including 2 olympic gold medals, and is a very successful head coach at Oklahoma State.
It's definitely true that the longer ago the athlete performed, the less outstanding his contributions seem. Not just for wrestling, it's true for any sport. We remember the heroes of our youth. Beyond that, it becomes very hard to say who was the best ever in wrestling (or much of anything else worth doing). Medved, Gable and Karelin were all great, and choosing between them is pretty meaningless. Great is great.fullerene said:What makes Karelin seem great is that he was great and most people remember his period of domination when they were younger.
What makes Gable seem great is that he was great and people remember hearing about him as a wrestler when he was a dominant American coach when they were younger.
What makes Medved not seem as great is that he won all three gold medals before most of the posters were born.
I thik FILA is the most qualified organization to choose and they've put Medbed and Karelin on top. Gable's argument would be that he had the potential to surpass anyone, but if you want to judge based on potential you open yourself up to a whole lot of speculative debate, including people who were athletic ut didn't accomplish a whole lot--that's true for any sport.
cycgrappler said:Cael Sanderson was something like 160-0 in his college career before winning the olympics.