This is the second article in my Fundamentals of Fighting series for Omni Movement. The introductory article discussed the difference between fundamentals and basics, and this article begins my deeper analysis of each of the three main fundamentals that I outlined--distance, timing and positioning. Here's a link to the blog, where I'll be posting each article as I continue the series:
http://www.omnimovement.com/blog-2/
Control of distance is a concept familiar to anyone who has ever been involved in combat sports. Its a common phrase among coaches, commentators and even couch potatoes. There are many complex factors at play when controlling distance. Fighters need to be taught important skills such as measuring distance and manipulating distance in order to control it. However, before getting into the how, we need to understand the why. In the second installment of this ongoing series breaking down fundamentals, were going to take a close look at the concept of critical distance.
Critical distance is a universal concept that is found in all styles of combat. While the precise definition varies somewhat from style to style, the general idea always remains the same: critical distance is the range at which your attacks will be the most effective and your opponents the least effective. Those familiar with the Sweet Science will recognize immediately how critical distance is, well, critical to a fighters ability to hit and dont get hit. The very definition of controlling distance is forcing the fight to take place at your critical distance instead of your opponents. It is obviously impossible to constantly maintain the same range for the entire fight, but if the fighter is able to ensure that the majority of exchanges take place at his preferred range, then he will almost always win the fight.
The pertinent question at this point is what determines critical distance? Some might answer that question by saying the build of the fighter. Taller fighters are better on the outside and shorter fighters are better on the inside, right? While theres certainly truth to the notion, it doesnt always work out exactly that way. For a simple illustration, a tall wrestlers critical distance may actually be closer than a short kickers critical distance. Thus, critical distance is more accurately determined by what tools the fighter prefers to attack with. Granted, the build of the fighter has a significant influence on which tools he develops. A tall fighter with long limbs will often prefer straight punches and straight kicks, while a shorter, more compact fighter may prefer tight hooks, uppercuts and low kicks. However, there is enormous variation in skill-sets and styles even among fighters of similar builds, making critical distance unique based on the preferred weapons of the individual. Its important to note that every attack has its own ideal distance, which contributes to the overall concept of a fighters critical distance.
As we now understand it, critical distance is the range at which a fighter can initiate his most effective attacks without having to worry about his opponents most dangerous weapons. It is helpful to have a general understanding of range. Different styles will break distance down into different ranges. Ive often encountered the idea of four fighting ranges: kicking range, punching range, clinching range and grappling range. Personally, I prefer to break range down into three categorieslong range, medium range and close range. The reason I prefer this system is that it is a little more flexible and accounts for multiple strikes being thrown within the same ranges. For example, at what is often called punching range, a fighter is also often at a good distance to attack with kicks, knees, elbows, and even shot based takedowns. Similarly, a fighter at kicking range may be attacking with a variety of kicks all of which have a different ideal distance. To account for this variability, I say that fighters either like to fight on the outside (long range), in the pocket (medium range) or on the inside (close range). The exact definitions of these ranges isnt of great importance, as its more important to remember that every strike has its own unique ideal distance. To put it simply, long range is outside or just at the edge of arms reach, medium range is within arms reach, and close range is body-to-body contact.
With the theory of critical distance now established, it's time to apply these concepts to actual fights. In the second half of the article, I examine how two underdogs dethroned dominant champions through their superior control of critical distance:
In order to get a clearer understanding of how a fighter benefits from controlling critical distance, lets examine a few notable cases, starting with Anthony Pettis. Showtime is a fighter whose critical distance is relatively simple to figure out. Remember, the best way to determine critical distance is by first identifying a fighters most effective weapons. For Pettis, its clearly his rear leg round kicks to the body and head. Hidden in a dazzling array of jumping and spinning kicks, the real core of Pettis game is simply feinting a rear straight and throwing a rear kick. He kicks so hard, so fast and with so much accuracy behind his feints that standing at long range with him is nearly a suicidal proposition. Even the notoriously durable Donald Cerrone, Benson Henderson and Joe Lauzon all folded under his kicking onslaught when they hung around on the outside.
Pettis circles back and to his left, the direction that will create the most space against his orthodox opponent. He springs forward with a quick combination. The punches are crisp, but Pettis isnt loading up or sitting down on them. He just wants to see how Lauzon responds, and give Lauzon something to think about as he walks forward. Later in the fight, he flashes a few more quick punches, again without any real hurting intent behind them. Immediately after, he feints a 1-2 and destroys Lauzon with a perfect left high kick. This is what happens when you let a fighter establish his critical distance. Pettis is free to work his setups and initiate his favorite offense, while Lauzon is stuck reacting and unable to get anything off. Its clear that to beat Pettis, a fighter must do their best to make sure that exchanges arent taking place on the outside. However, it isnt as simple as just closing the distance, as Gilbert Melendez found out:
Coming forward aggressively, Melendez overall did a good job of staying out of the ideal distance for Pettis kicks. However, he was too desperate to avoid that range. Knowing he had nothing for Pettis at long range, he was swinging wildly and predictably coming forward. This meant that even though he was getting closer to what should have been his own critical distance (the pocket for his punches, the inside for his wrestling), he was putting himself in bad positions and making it easy for Pettis to time him. As a result, he got hurt by counter punches before leaving his neck exposed on a desperate shot and tapping to a guillotine. Critical distance isnt as simple as Pettis wins at long range, Melendez wins at medium range. Melendez left himself too vulnerable, even at ranges that should have been favorable to him, all because he needed to avoid Pettis critical distance so badly. There was a man who was able to establish his own critical distance against Pettis AND be competitive even at Pettis critical distance, which is why that man is the current lightweight champion.
As Pettis attempts to circle and create space, dos Anjos calmly cuts him off. He stays in front of Pettis flashing his jab, and slams kicks into his body at range. Hes then able to step in behind his jab and smash Pettis in the face with a left straight. This is the exact opposite of what we saw against LauzonRDA is now the one getting his shots off while Pettis is reactive. Dos Anjos establishes his critical distance by showing Pettis that hes dangerous at long range with his kicks in order to back Pettis up, then stepping into the pocket once Pettis has nowhere left to retreat. From the pocket, dos Anjos was able to land hard punches on Pettis, and also initiate his takedowns.
Pettis inability to get space meant that even though he was able to return fire in spots and throw a few of his own kicks, he was fighting a losing fight. Dos Anjos, by forcing both the striking and grappling exchanges to take place at his optimal range, controlled the majority of the fight.
Continued:
http://www.omnimovement.com/blog-2/
Control of distance is a concept familiar to anyone who has ever been involved in combat sports. Its a common phrase among coaches, commentators and even couch potatoes. There are many complex factors at play when controlling distance. Fighters need to be taught important skills such as measuring distance and manipulating distance in order to control it. However, before getting into the how, we need to understand the why. In the second installment of this ongoing series breaking down fundamentals, were going to take a close look at the concept of critical distance.
Critical distance is a universal concept that is found in all styles of combat. While the precise definition varies somewhat from style to style, the general idea always remains the same: critical distance is the range at which your attacks will be the most effective and your opponents the least effective. Those familiar with the Sweet Science will recognize immediately how critical distance is, well, critical to a fighters ability to hit and dont get hit. The very definition of controlling distance is forcing the fight to take place at your critical distance instead of your opponents. It is obviously impossible to constantly maintain the same range for the entire fight, but if the fighter is able to ensure that the majority of exchanges take place at his preferred range, then he will almost always win the fight.
The pertinent question at this point is what determines critical distance? Some might answer that question by saying the build of the fighter. Taller fighters are better on the outside and shorter fighters are better on the inside, right? While theres certainly truth to the notion, it doesnt always work out exactly that way. For a simple illustration, a tall wrestlers critical distance may actually be closer than a short kickers critical distance. Thus, critical distance is more accurately determined by what tools the fighter prefers to attack with. Granted, the build of the fighter has a significant influence on which tools he develops. A tall fighter with long limbs will often prefer straight punches and straight kicks, while a shorter, more compact fighter may prefer tight hooks, uppercuts and low kicks. However, there is enormous variation in skill-sets and styles even among fighters of similar builds, making critical distance unique based on the preferred weapons of the individual. Its important to note that every attack has its own ideal distance, which contributes to the overall concept of a fighters critical distance.
As we now understand it, critical distance is the range at which a fighter can initiate his most effective attacks without having to worry about his opponents most dangerous weapons. It is helpful to have a general understanding of range. Different styles will break distance down into different ranges. Ive often encountered the idea of four fighting ranges: kicking range, punching range, clinching range and grappling range. Personally, I prefer to break range down into three categorieslong range, medium range and close range. The reason I prefer this system is that it is a little more flexible and accounts for multiple strikes being thrown within the same ranges. For example, at what is often called punching range, a fighter is also often at a good distance to attack with kicks, knees, elbows, and even shot based takedowns. Similarly, a fighter at kicking range may be attacking with a variety of kicks all of which have a different ideal distance. To account for this variability, I say that fighters either like to fight on the outside (long range), in the pocket (medium range) or on the inside (close range). The exact definitions of these ranges isnt of great importance, as its more important to remember that every strike has its own unique ideal distance. To put it simply, long range is outside or just at the edge of arms reach, medium range is within arms reach, and close range is body-to-body contact.
With the theory of critical distance now established, it's time to apply these concepts to actual fights. In the second half of the article, I examine how two underdogs dethroned dominant champions through their superior control of critical distance:
In order to get a clearer understanding of how a fighter benefits from controlling critical distance, lets examine a few notable cases, starting with Anthony Pettis. Showtime is a fighter whose critical distance is relatively simple to figure out. Remember, the best way to determine critical distance is by first identifying a fighters most effective weapons. For Pettis, its clearly his rear leg round kicks to the body and head. Hidden in a dazzling array of jumping and spinning kicks, the real core of Pettis game is simply feinting a rear straight and throwing a rear kick. He kicks so hard, so fast and with so much accuracy behind his feints that standing at long range with him is nearly a suicidal proposition. Even the notoriously durable Donald Cerrone, Benson Henderson and Joe Lauzon all folded under his kicking onslaught when they hung around on the outside.
Pettis circles back and to his left, the direction that will create the most space against his orthodox opponent. He springs forward with a quick combination. The punches are crisp, but Pettis isnt loading up or sitting down on them. He just wants to see how Lauzon responds, and give Lauzon something to think about as he walks forward. Later in the fight, he flashes a few more quick punches, again without any real hurting intent behind them. Immediately after, he feints a 1-2 and destroys Lauzon with a perfect left high kick. This is what happens when you let a fighter establish his critical distance. Pettis is free to work his setups and initiate his favorite offense, while Lauzon is stuck reacting and unable to get anything off. Its clear that to beat Pettis, a fighter must do their best to make sure that exchanges arent taking place on the outside. However, it isnt as simple as just closing the distance, as Gilbert Melendez found out:
Coming forward aggressively, Melendez overall did a good job of staying out of the ideal distance for Pettis kicks. However, he was too desperate to avoid that range. Knowing he had nothing for Pettis at long range, he was swinging wildly and predictably coming forward. This meant that even though he was getting closer to what should have been his own critical distance (the pocket for his punches, the inside for his wrestling), he was putting himself in bad positions and making it easy for Pettis to time him. As a result, he got hurt by counter punches before leaving his neck exposed on a desperate shot and tapping to a guillotine. Critical distance isnt as simple as Pettis wins at long range, Melendez wins at medium range. Melendez left himself too vulnerable, even at ranges that should have been favorable to him, all because he needed to avoid Pettis critical distance so badly. There was a man who was able to establish his own critical distance against Pettis AND be competitive even at Pettis critical distance, which is why that man is the current lightweight champion.
As Pettis attempts to circle and create space, dos Anjos calmly cuts him off. He stays in front of Pettis flashing his jab, and slams kicks into his body at range. Hes then able to step in behind his jab and smash Pettis in the face with a left straight. This is the exact opposite of what we saw against LauzonRDA is now the one getting his shots off while Pettis is reactive. Dos Anjos establishes his critical distance by showing Pettis that hes dangerous at long range with his kicks in order to back Pettis up, then stepping into the pocket once Pettis has nowhere left to retreat. From the pocket, dos Anjos was able to land hard punches on Pettis, and also initiate his takedowns.
Pettis inability to get space meant that even though he was able to return fire in spots and throw a few of his own kicks, he was fighting a losing fight. Dos Anjos, by forcing both the striking and grappling exchanges to take place at his optimal range, controlled the majority of the fight.
Continued:
