- Joined
- Jan 9, 2017
- Messages
- 9,784
- Reaction score
- 8,400
Beating Khabib round 1.10-5 total. I score it 12-3 for Conor since I have him beating Mendes round 1 and Khabib round 1.
Lol bro did you even watch the fight
Beating Khabib round 1.10-5 total. I score it 12-3 for Conor since I have him beating Mendes round 1 and Khabib round 1.
https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/friendly-discussion-about-scoring-conor-khabib-round-1.4126447/Beating Khabib round 1.
Lol bro did you even watch the fight
Yeh I'm not reading that. If you need to use so many words to make a very simple point you are clearly talking shit
That thread is about thoroughly demonstrating how there's a good case for Conor winning the round, and thus how it's silly for people to claim it's crazy to score the round for Conor. And that's why it's thorough.Yeh I'm not reading that. If you need to use so many words to make a very simple point you are clearly talking shit
It's not too long for me.That thread is about thoroughly demonstrating how there's a good case for Conor winning the round, and thus how it's silly for people to claim it's crazy to score the round for Conor. And that's why it's thorough.
I could give you a quick response as to why Conor won the round. But I'm sure you'll just repeat the same stuff a bunch of dumdums did in that thread. Cliffs: Conor won the striking and that's most important in the scoring. He landed the best strikes AND by far the most strikes. All Khabib had was control, which is irrelevant to scoring if Conor won the striking. Let me guess, this is also too long for you?
Are you able to provide me with new information as to how that's the case? Or even some of the same old shit I've heard before?It's not too long for me.
It is too wrong for me, though.
^^^^^^^ThisOh dear, finishing someone definitely means that they WON that round, so you need to include them.
We are never going to agree. I don't think Conor's striking was effective, and I do think khabibs grappling was effective. You think the oppositeAre you able to provide me with new information as to how that's the case? Or even some of the same old shit I've heard before?
@THE-06
whens the last time he actually ko'd someone before Aldo?
lights out KO ?
in fact any KO with lights out ?
one score card was a 47-47 draw.
I didn’t include KOs or submissions as wins or losses because its not a complete round and they would have just canceled each other out.
This is not a good record for someone who is literally called a Diamond.
I did the math.
I was going through all of Conor’s UFC fights I’ve found that he has lost 9 rounds and won only 7.
I didn’t include KOs or submissions as wins or losses because its not a complete round and they would have just canceled each other out.
Holloway 3W
Siver 1W
Mendes 1L
Nate 1L
Nate 3L 2W
Eddie 1W
Khabib 3L
This is not a good record for someone who is literally called a Diamond.
Do you think Conor needs to put away Dustin early?
Anyway, I fully believe Conor will win, but I thought this was interesting.
I like your dedication and it really is a fun fact! I would never have guessed it to be fair. I am of the belief Conor will likely KOd Dustin in the first, maybe second. If not, I still don't count Conor out, but it's gonna be a hell of a fightI did the math.
I was going through all of Conor’s UFC fights I’ve found that he has lost 9 rounds and won only 7.
I didn’t include KOs or submissions as wins or losses because its not a complete round and they would have just canceled each other out.
Holloway 3W
Siver 1W
Mendes 1L
Nate 1L
Nate 3L 2W
Eddie 1W
Khabib 3L
This is not a good record for someone who is literally called a Diamond.
Do you think Conor needs to put away Dustin early?
Anyway, I fully believe Conor will win, but I thought this was interesting.