FROM should sellout and create an annual Dark Souls
- Thread starter Queen B
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 16,087
- Reaction score
- 220
Because then we'd get more Dark Souls 2 and no one wants that.
the game did do weapon balance well and the innovation of power stancing was cool. too bad they introduced the idiotic Soul Level system that just made PvP a complete hassle
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Messages
- 9,078
- Reaction score
- 125
I liked 2 a whole shit lot better then 3. I never played Demon Souls or the first Dark Souls but out of DS2, DS3, and BB I liked DS2 the best and don't really get the hate it gets.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 16,087
- Reaction score
- 220
That's cool, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Even if it's a very, very bad one.
What was your favorite part of DS2? Fighting the Smelter Demon boss? ... or the other Smelter Demon Boss? How about the boss that was literally just a bunch of rats - can't forget the boss that was just one big rat that had three rats with him; whew, what a doozy amirite?
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Messages
- 9,078
- Reaction score
- 125
don't be a dick
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2008
- Messages
- 16,087
- Reaction score
- 220
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Messages
- 7,611
- Reaction score
- 1,524
Royal Dog Authority, imo.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 8,773
- Reaction score
- 705
That only covers a small fraction of the bosses though. Dark Souls 2 still has many quality boss fights. The bosses in Dark Souls 3 are better though no question.
Still at the end of the day I too prefer Dark Souls 2(SotfS). The game is so big with so many viable builds for both PVP and PVE as well as stuff to do. Dark Souls 3 is strongly lacking in build variety and its so damn linear, I struggle getting through Undead Settlement for the billionth time before giving up on a playthrough.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 17,217
- Reaction score
- 5,666
No thanks.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 23,393
- Reaction score
- 34,447
Why would you want such a great franchise ruined?
Besides, From basically was doing an annual release for three consecutive years there:
Dark Souls 2 - March 2014
Bloodborne- March 2015
Dark Souls 3 - March 2016
Besides, From basically was doing an annual release for three consecutive years there:
Dark Souls 2 - March 2014
Bloodborne- March 2015
Dark Souls 3 - March 2016
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2013
- Messages
- 4,376
- Reaction score
- 264
Or make another Armored Core. WHO IS WITH ME! Sorry very niche.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
- Messages
- 11,781
- Reaction score
- 8,999
Werent they developing this even before DS2? The A team worked on this for 5+ years whilst the B team worked on DS2 and it shows.
Bloodborne is one of the GOAT games ever.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 23,393
- Reaction score
- 34,447
Yeah, something like that I think. After Dark Souls 1 came out in October 2011 the main team went to work on Bloodborne for the next three years.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
- Messages
- 11,781
- Reaction score
- 8,999
Didnt they work on it simultaneously with DS1? Sony got in a deal with them after Demon Souls.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 23,393
- Reaction score
- 34,447
Did they? I don’t know.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
- Messages
- 11,781
- Reaction score
- 8,999
Im sure BB took the longest to develop. You could tell by the polish and attention to detail and cohesiveness the later games lacked.
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2015
- Messages
- 23,393
- Reaction score
- 34,447
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2017
- Messages
- 11,781
- Reaction score
- 8,999
Ahh I remember reading Miyazaki had the idea for BB long after DS. But do we know the timeframe? I was wrong on th 5+ years thing it seems.
"Development of Bloodborne began as development was being completed on the Prepare to Die edition of Dark Souls, released in August 2012."
Couldve been early 2012? Full development mightve began then but maybe concept was earlier? Still most polished and complete title theyve made, which only had the loading issue when released.
