- Joined
- Feb 4, 2022
- Messages
- 14,700
- Reaction score
- 28,946
Were you not rationalizing why it might not be petty bitchiness to keep Francis out?That is opinion. And I am not even talking about Dana. From what I understand Dana was not even there,
Were you not rationalizing why it might not be petty bitchiness to keep Francis out?That is opinion. And I am not even talking about Dana. From what I understand Dana was not even there,
That has nothing to do with Dana. Giving a rational reason is not the same as rationalizing, which is a defense mechanism, typically to justify controversial behaviors. Businesses frequently do not allow former employees, especially those who leave on bad terms, to enter their place of business.Were you not rationalizing why it might not be petty bitchiness to keep Francis out?
I was commenting on Dana and you seem to be confusing the UFC with Wal-Mart.That has nothing to do with Dana. Giving a rational reason is not the same as rationalizing, which is a defense mechanism, typically to justify controversial behaviors. Businesses frequently do not allow former employees, especially those who leave on bad terms, to enter their place of business.
Fair enough, but my reply was more about corporate culture (and not just Wal-Mart). Sorry for any confusion.I was commenting on Dana and you seem to be confusing the UFC with Wal-Mart.
In a store like Wal-Mart, it makes sense not to let former employees back. In a business like the UFC, it makes more sense to let Francis in and let rumors spread that he's trying to come back, thereby making the competition scramble.Fair enough, but my reply was more about corporate culture (and not just Wal-Mart). Sorry for any confusion.
Makes sense. Cheers.In a store like Wal-Mart, it makes sense not to let former employees back. In a business like the UFC, it makes more sense to let Francis in and let rumors spread that he's trying to come back, thereby making the competition scramble.