- Joined
- Apr 24, 2016
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 228
Who ranks higher all time? I say Floyd is the better fighter (more skilled), while Pacquiao is the greater fighter (better resume and accomplishments).
if he beat spence or crawford right now, i think he’s top 3It's up for debate. Obviously Floyd being "undefeated" is a big deal and he won titles in 5 divisions. However, Pac doing it in 8 divisions is legendary. The fact he just beat Thurman (regardless of whatever Floyd fans want to say about that) is a massive accomplishment. If he beat someone like Spence or Crawford, that would cement him as a top 10 fighter of all time in my opinion.
If Pac did? Like top 3 all time?if he beat spence or crawford right now, i think he’s top 3
yesIf Pac did? Like top 3 all time?
Who ranks higher all time? I say Floyd is the better fighter (more skilled), while Pacquiao is the greater fighter (better resume and accomplishments).
Which of the two best fighters of their generation is better?
I'd say Floyd is the better fighter (As in, more skilled), while Pacquiao is the greater fighter (Accomplishments and resume).
if pac beat crawford or spence right now in their prime, his resume would be prime crawford/spence, barrera x2, morales x2, margarito, prime cotto, hatton, thurman, prime marquez x2, bradley x2
then a bunch of decent wins over champs in matthysse, broner, vargas, algieri, ledwaba, diaz, rios, etc
that would be arguably the best resumé of all time. it’s already up there. if he never lost to horn or torrecampo, i’d have him top 5 right now
i thought both were close. thought horn won and bradley lost. haven’t watched them since they happened live though.In reality I think the majority of people think he was robbed in the Horn and Bradley fights.
Those 2 Marquez wins are jokes tooif pac beat crawford or spence right now in their prime, his resume would be prime crawford/spence, barrera x2, morales x2, margarito, prime cotto, hatton, thurman, prime marquez x2, bradley x2
then a bunch of decent wins over champs in matthysse, broner, vargas, algieri, ledwaba, diaz, rios, etc
that would be arguably the best resumé of all time. it’s already up there. if he never lost to horn or torrecampo, i’d have him top 5 right now
eh. can’t agree. about as ridiculous as the marquez draw.Those 2 Marquez wins are jokes too
if pac beat crawford or spence right now in their prime, his resume would be prime crawford/spence, barrera x2, morales x2, margarito, prime cotto, hatton, thurman, prime marquez x2, bradley x2
then a bunch of decent wins over champs in matthysse, broner, vargas, algieri, ledwaba, diaz, rios, etc
that would be arguably the best resumé of all time. it’s already up there. if he never lost to horn or torrecampo, i’d have him top 5 right now
The draw was a scoring error but Marquez clearly won the majority of the rounds.eh. can’t agree. about as ridiculous as the marquez draw.
floyd’s resumé is damn good too though. canelo was in his 154-pound prime regardless of what this forum may think. lots of the past-prime guys he fought came when he was also past his prime so it’s kinda a wash.Resume wise he leaves Floyd for dust. Floyd has the spotless record. I don't think you'd use the word prime for most of Floyd's opponents(elite). Just saying
I can't remember the time as much, but wasn't Cotto pretty prime when Floyd beat him? I know he had the losses to Margarito and Pacman, but he beat the crap out of Margarito in the plaster of paris-free rematch right around that time and looked really good IIRC.floyd’s got prime corrales, prime hatton, prime castillo x2, prime-ish canelo.
he beat cotto, pacquiao, marquez, mosley when they were past their prime but so was he.
then decent champions like guerrero, hernandez, baldomir, ortiz, maidana, judah.