Fizogen?

Bobby Jacobsen

Amateur Fighter
Joined
Jun 1, 2004
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
0
Anybody use this stuff? They sponsor Couture but it is very expensive and the website seems way too hyper with the ads, like old muscletech ads.
 
I used Fizogen Blitz Cycle, it's a good product & they use quality ingredients but it's overpriced. There are lots of similar products for less.
 
i havent tried them simply because of the price. with what they cost they better work wonders.
 
Even on discount supplement sites it's hella expensive. Has anybody tried specifically the on cycle and off cycle?

How can they make claims that you will always put on muscle? I mean eventually you will be as big as you can get. The way they advertise it you could end up @ 500lbs and ripped.
 
After pro hormones were banned in February, my store had to get rid of all the remaining pro hormones...it wasmy responsibilityto purchase them for the store so I felt it my obligation to see that they were properly disposed of, down my hatch.

So what Im saying is I have 8 bottles of On Cycle and 6 Off Cycle.
Haven't tried them yet because Im still waiting to take the Gaspari products.

I'll let you know when I start.
 
Mass Cycle worked pretty well for me, but again it is overpriced for what it is.
 
I was told the On Cycle Off Cycle was bogus: same as the Andro generation.
 
It's an andro product? All that hype and I guess I didn't read that close or something. That is a ton of money for something that has consistently been proven to do nothing (or very close to it). W
 
Bobby Jacobsen said:
It's an andro product? All that hype and I guess I didn't read that close or something. That is a ton of money for something that has consistently been proven to do nothing (or very close to it). W

I don't think it's andro, but it's from that same generation of pro-hormones.

Superdrol was just discontinued, fellas, Bulk Nutrition is having a sale on it. Since it's been a bestseller since it hit, I'm assuming the discontinuation is a result of legal nitpicking over what exactly constitutes a prohormone, and this one was too close. It must work.
 
Back
Top