Elections Fishy Fishy California Recall

One of the boldest cases of voter fraud was when Mayor Daly of Chicago basically engineered a Kennedy win in Illinois through
union manipulation of voter tally and intimidation at polling sites.
The delegate votes for JFK essentially put him over the top and ensconced him in the White House.
but he then shit on unions and their leadership, let RFK go after Hoffa et al.
He went further than that of course by fucking one of Sam Giancana's gfs, Marilyn Monroe, who was then 'suicided' hillary style.
Then of course the mob teamed up with Castro, they having deep ties and investments in Cuba at the time, to miraculously pull
off the biggest assassination fraud in modern history, followed closely by the Lincoln "assassination".
 
One of the boldest cases of voter fraud was when Mayor Daly of Chicago basically engineered a Kennedy win in Illinois through
union manipulation of voter tally and intimidation at polling sites.
The delegate votes for JFK essentially put him over the top and ensconced him in the White House.
but he then shit on unions and their leadership, let RFK go after Hoffa et al.
He went further than that of course by fucking one of Sam Giancana's gfs, Marilyn Monroe, who was then 'suicided' hillary style.
Then of course the mob teamed up with Castro, they having deep ties and investments in Cuba at the time, to miraculously pull
off the biggest assassination fraud in modern history, followed closely by the Lincoln "assassination".
Too many conspiracy theories to tackle in one post, but I’ll leave this here:

Here's a voter fraud myth: Richard Daley ‘stole’ Illinois for John Kennedy in the 1960 election
 
"On Wednesday afternoon, November 9, 1960, Nixon officially conceded the election to Kennedy. He told his friend, journalist Earl Mazo, that “our country cannot afford the agony of a constitutional crisis.” (Mazo had written a series of articles about voter fraud after the 1960 election, which he stopped at Nixon’s request.)

In later years, Nixon also claimed in an autobiography that widespread fraud happened in Illinois and Texas during the 1960 election.

However, despite Nixon’s requests and decisions to not ask for a recount, the Republican Party had other ideas. In 2000, historian David Greenberg recounted the GOP’s efforts to contest the election in an article for Slate.

Greenberg said it was Mazo who helped to publicize the idea that voter fraud cost Nixon the election, and that Republican officials pursued recounts and investigations in 11 states. In the end, Nixon wound up losing the state of Hawaii to Kennedy after the recounts.

But that doesn’t mean that Daley didn’t affect the outcome in Illinois.

“The GOP's failure to prove fraud doesn't mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable,” Greenberg said.
The drama behind President Kennedy's 1960 election winhttps://constitutioncenter.org › blog › the-drama-behind...
 
It was also determined after a manual recount that Nixon actually won California, his home state, and not Kennedy as was initially reported.
Do both sides engage in mystery votes and shady practices? Sure they do.
Dems are better at it though IMO.
 
Guaranteed the California recall system was constructed by republicans.
Seems you might be wrong.

"The leading conservatives of the time remained unwavering in their opposition to the recall. Leading the charge was the Los Angeles Times, which repeatedly referred to the direct democracy provisions as "freak legislation." The Times editorialized that the passage of the recall "show[ed the] remarkable caprice of ballot wielders." Interestingly enough, the Times was also a leading opponent of the Southern Pacific.

The progressive reforms were brought to the people to approve in October, with twenty-three total amendments being voted on, including such notables as women's suffrage and all three direct democracy provisions. Twenty-two of the amendments passed, with the recall garnering the second largest vote total."

https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1682
 

UILokos_1.gif
 
Basically these claims where launch a week ago when Elders knew he was going to lose in historic numbers. Honestly Republicans game plan is to raise questions on every election before the Presidential races. They are the biggest sore losers.
 
So, when do we start looking for bamboo fibers?
 
"On Wednesday afternoon, November 9, 1960, Nixon officially conceded the election to Kennedy. He told his friend, journalist Earl Mazo, that “our country cannot afford the agony of a constitutional crisis.” (Mazo had written a series of articles about voter fraud after the 1960 election, which he stopped at Nixon’s request.)

In later years, Nixon also claimed in an autobiography that widespread fraud happened in Illinois and Texas during the 1960 election.

However, despite Nixon’s requests and decisions to not ask for a recount, the Republican Party had other ideas. In 2000, historian David Greenberg recounted the GOP’s efforts to contest the election in an article for Slate.

Greenberg said it was Mazo who helped to publicize the idea that voter fraud cost Nixon the election, and that Republican officials pursued recounts and investigations in 11 states. In the end, Nixon wound up losing the state of Hawaii to Kennedy after the recounts.

But that doesn’t mean that Daley didn’t affect the outcome in Illinois.

“The GOP's failure to prove fraud doesn't mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable,” Greenberg said.
The drama behind President Kennedy's 1960 election winhttps://constitutioncenter.org › blog › the-drama-behind...
So an out of touch authoritarian former President declared he really won without any proof?

Seems familiar.

The 1960 election was thoroughly investigated and it was clear that Kennedy won. He also won Texas, so Illinois didn’t even matter.

Debunking the right's enduring myth: The truth about Richard Nixon and the fight to overturn the 1960 election
 
It was also determined after a manual recount that Nixon actually won California, his home state, and not Kennedy as was initially reported.
Do both sides engage in mystery votes and shady practices? Sure they do.
Dems are better at it though IMO.
It was counting absentee ballots that flipped CA to Nixon, not a recount.
 
Yeah, a handful of ballots cast at a high school in Woodland Hills that will took a bit longer than normal to process is super "fishy". These definitely cast into doubt the legitimacy of the nearly 2 to 1 vote advantage for retaining Newsom that prevails by over two and a half million votes out of fewer than 10 million votes cast (with 74% reporting).
 
wondering how a recall vote was determined overnight when swing state votes typically take 6 weeks.
 
Back
Top