First race flipped from D winning to R winning from "glitch"

b34stmode

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Dec 14, 2010
Messages
4,754
Reaction score
2,647
https://www.freep.com/story/news/lo...county-election-2020-race-results/6184186002/


"In Oakland County’s 15th County Commission District — representing Rochester and Rochester Hills — the initial count gave a 104-vote margin to the Democrat, Melanie Hartman, amounting to a razor-thin majority of 50.08%. That stunned the incumbent, Adam Kochenderfer, giving him a sure sense that he’d lost in a district long deemed a Republican stronghold."


“Apparently, there was a technical glitch in Rochester Hills. And so I actually ended up winning by a little over 1,100 votes,” said a chuckling Kochenderfer.

The margin was 1,127 votes, to be exact. That gave him a 51.67% share of the total (with 48.23% going to his opponent, Hartman.)

Now some math.

The glitch in this case changed it to 50.08% to 48.23%, so a 1.85% change.

1.85% of the votes in Michigan would be over 100,000 votes, if you took 100,000 away from Biden and gave them to Trump then that flips Michigan.


Why is it all these "glitches" that we are finding only flipped for Democrats? Isn't that weird?
 
https://www.freep.com/story/news/lo...county-election-2020-race-results/6184186002/


"In Oakland County’s 15th County Commission District — representing Rochester and Rochester Hills — the initial count gave a 104-vote margin to the Democrat, Melanie Hartman, amounting to a razor-thin majority of 50.08%. That stunned the incumbent, Adam Kochenderfer, giving him a sure sense that he’d lost in a district long deemed a Republican stronghold."


“Apparently, there was a technical glitch in Rochester Hills. And so I actually ended up winning by a little over 1,100 votes,” said a chuckling Kochenderfer.

The margin was 1,127 votes, to be exact. That gave him a 51.67% share of the total (with 48.23% going to his opponent, Hartman.)

Now some math.

The glitch in this case changed it to 50.08% to 48.23%, so a 1.85% change.

1.85% of the votes in Michigan would be over 100,000 votes, if you took 100,000 away from Biden and gave them to Trump then that flips Michigan.


Why is it all these "glitches" that we are finding only flipped for Democrats? Isn't that weird?
I’m working in Rochester hills 2maro. It was on the ride home that I counted the 33 to 1 Trump over Biden signs.
 
so trump wins now? oh wait this is still a big nothingburger
 
And the process worked apparently without regard to politics. A Republican city clerk supervised a vote count that wrongly gave victory to a Democrat, after which a Democratic county clerk's staff caught the error and requested a correction from the Republican city clerk, handing the win to a Republican.

Whoa man, like the Democrats rigged to vote to give the elections to Democrats, but a Republican made the error which was caught by Democrats who were rigging the election to throw off the scent from all the other rigging that they were doing with the help of Republicans to rig for the Democrat.

{<jordan}
 
Glitch doesn't mean fraud. It could go either way
 
Did you dipshits even read the article?

And the process worked apparently without regard to politics. A Republican city clerk supervised a vote count that wrongly gave victory to a Democrat, after which a Democratic county clerk's staff caught the error and requested a correction from the Republican city clerk, handing the win to a Republican.

A Republican city clerk made a clerical error and a Democrat county clerk spotted it and alerted her to that fact. This is not an example of voter fraud.
 
A glitch in a program usually occurs because a value is undefined, a process times out, or there is a memory leak. There’re also not called glitches, they’re called bugs. And it’s highly, highly improbable that a bug would favor Democrats over Republicans.


You guys are being gullible as fuck. Also if you read a lot half of these “glitches”, you’d realize they are driven by human error.
 
Did you dipshits even read the article?



A Republican city clerk made a clerical error and a Democrat county clerk spotted it and alerted her to that fact. This is not an example of voter fraud.
Yeah this one doesn’t look like fraud, so far.
 
"And the process worked apparently without regard to politics. A Republican city clerk supervised a vote count that wrongly gave victory to a Democrat, after which a Democratic county clerk's staff caught the error and requested a correction from the Republican city clerk, handing the win to a Republican."

So no fraud there then ? NEXT....
 
A glitch in a program usually occurs because a value is undefined, a process times out, or there is a memory leak. There’re also not called glitches, they’re called bugs. And it’s highly, highly improbable that a bug would favor Democrats over Republicans.


You guys are being gullible as fuck. Also if you read a lot half of these “glitches”, you’d realize they are driven by human error.

“A computer issue in Rochester Hills caused them to send us results for seven precincts as both precinct votes and absentee votes. They should only have been sent to us as absentee votes,” Rozell said in a text message.

<BC1>
 
No, no. My Democrat friends tell me this is impossible.

This story is 4-days old, it was already discussed. It's an example of how the system should work. It was not fraud, it was a mistake that was immediately caught and corrected in a tiny county.

And the process worked apparently without regard to politics. A Republican city clerk supervised a vote count that wrongly gave victory to a Democrat, after which a Democratic county clerk's staff caught the error and requested a correction from the Republican city clerk, handing the win to a Republican.

^ From the article.
 
Back
Top