feminist perspective on the california shooter

Feminism. Trying to discrminate under the guise of "equality". /facedesk

real classy trying to hijack attention from a mass murder with the victim card.
 
How about this gem:



Motherfucker, what culture do you live in where basic morals are not already hammered into our skulls? Everybody is already taught to solve problems with words. Everybody is already taught that hurting someone is wrong, that stealing is wrong, let alone rape and murder. What Powell and other feminists are suggesting is not education, we have already been educated. We are not children who've grown up in third world nations where terrible violence is an everyday part of life.

Look at the subtext guys, what Powell and other feminists are really suggesting is the indoctrination of guilt. They want men to be lectured to ad infinitum on the evils of men until men are inundated with shame and guilt. Me and my entire peer group have always known that hurting people is wrong and I can't name one of them who would not be disgusted or outraged or otherwise extremely, extremely alarmed to know that one of his peers has committed a form of violence as grave as rape or murder.

It's like, fuck off already. The people who are willing to rape and murder will do so regardless of the amount of times and all various ways that they are told it's not nice.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

untitled-22jabd3.gif
 
But the hashtag is a response to the manifesto and general pattern of thinking, not the proportion of female victims.

General pattern of thinking? I don't know what kind of thoughts you have, but I haven't heard of many instances of men shooting up campuses because they can't get laid. Also, I haven't heard any of the males I know speak like the psycho who shot up the campus.

Most men aren't as evil as the feminists have led you to believe.
 
Where do you find stuff like this?

I Google image searched the term 'feminist mangina' to see if I could find something funny for the YLYL thread and I saw the above pic. I figured it would be a fitting picture for this thread.
 
I Google image searched the term 'feminist mangina' to see if I could find something funny for the YLYL thread and I saw the above pic. I figured it would be a fitting picture for this thread.

Haha no really. Where?
 
Haha no really. Where?

I'm being serious. I was searching for jokes about feminism and I came across that picture. I don't know what else to tell you. Type 'Feminist Mangina' into Google image search and you will eventually find the picture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the real bs is the way sexual assault had been taught, where the focus was on teaching women how not to get raped, as opposed to teaching men not to rape, but that has been changing recently

like I said I really like where this thing is going

Oh god -____- I'll come back later and refute this fucktarded thread.. but in the meantime I got exams.
 
How about this gem:



Motherfucker, what culture do you live in where basic morals are not already hammered into our skulls? Everybody is already taught to solve problems with words. Everybody is already taught that hurting someone is wrong, that stealing is wrong, let alone rape and murder. What Powell and other feminists are suggesting is not education, we have already been educated. We are not children who've grown up in third world nations where terrible violence is an everyday part of life.

Look at the subtext guys, what Powell and other feminists are really suggesting is the indoctrination of guilt. They want men to be lectured to ad infinitum on the evils of men until men are inundated with shame and guilt. Me and my entire peer group have always known that hurting people is wrong and I can't name one of them who would not be disgusted or outraged or otherwise extremely, extremely alarmed to know that one of his peers has committed a form of violence as grave as rape or murder.

It's like, fuck off already. The people who are willing to rape and murder will do so regardless of the amount of times and all various ways that they are told it's not nice.

This, exactly this. I've said since day one that the kid was simply born with a head full of bad wiring. The lack of sex was nothing more than an excuse he gave himself. He could have been getting his balls drained by Playboy centerfolds every day, and sooner or later he would still have gone Full Norwegian.:rolleyes:
 
This, exactly this. I've said since day one that the kid was simply born with a head full of bad wiring. The lack of sex was nothing more than an excuse he gave himself. He could have been getting his balls drained by Playboy centerfolds every day, and sooner or later he would still have gone Full Norwegian.:rolleyes:

I agree. But the environment you're raised with (X-box, internet, divorce, no social life, lack of morals, lack of parenting), had a big impact as well. Maybe more than being born a certain way. I believe environment can overcome innate tendencies.
 
It's almost as if those detectives have to ascertain if something did or did not actually happen by the evidence present or not present... like they do for every other crime. Those sexist pigs!



Yes this is what lawyers do and have always done when they defend their clients, regardless of gender. They say a bunch of crazy shit.



How the fuck do you know if they were actual rapists if the evidence wasn't there saying they were? I could just as easily say those men were falsely accused of rape and were allowed to walk. We do have this pesky little thing called innocent until proven guilty. But I'm not even saying those men were innocent. I'm just saying to presume otherwise without evidence is plain stupid and frankly destructive.

Read the part where I said the DA's require SLAM DUNK evidence to charge. Speak to a DA and ask them of the evidence threshold for charging someone with rape is anywhere near robbery, assault, drug crimes, etc. They will tell you sex crimes are much higher, unfairly higher in every social worker and dectectives opinion ive gotten, which is around a dozen people ive spoke with. Ask them if the reasoning for this is the pursuit of justice or lack of resources.

Then ask yourself if 80% percent of these girls, many very young kids, are going through the very long and usually tramatic process of trying to press rape charges as some form of malevolent lie and get turned down because they get caught in it, or if they get turned away because creepy uncle had a the 2 brain cells it takes not to leave cum and witnesses at the crime scene.

As far as your comment about the girls having to go through multiple interviews with dectectives, you don't seem to understand the dectectives ascertain something did happen and give the approval to press charges and it's the DAs still shooting down 80% of these cases.
 
i think that the feminizing of american society has caused men to act more and more feminized, thus making them less attractive to women. women will tell you that they want a man who respects them and is kind to them, yet this is the complete opposite of what attracts women to men. men take this approach to be literal, in that acting this way will lead them to having sex with women, when it obviously doesn't.

society needs to realize that men and women are different, and that each gender needs to act differently. i don't mean to say that men should be assholes towards women. not at all. in fact, my biggest point here is that a man's natural personality, that of being a naturally strong, confident, and charming person, is what a man wants to be, and what a woman wants.

i see a lot of this in my youngest brother's generation. those kids born from 1990 and above. the personalities of men and women of this age seem to be so similar, it's scary. it's like schools are removing genders altogether.
 
Last edited:
i think that the feminizing of american society has caused men to act more and more feminized, thus making them less attractive to women. women will tell you that they want a man who respects them and is kind to them, yet this is the complete opposite of what attracts women to men. men take this approach to be literal, in that acting this way will lead them to having sex with women, when it obviously doesn't.

society needs to realize that men and women are different, and that each gender needs to act differently. i don't mean to say that men should be assholes towards women. not at all. in fact, my biggest point here is that a man's natural personality, that of being a naturally strong, confident, and charming person, is what a man wants to be, and what a woman wants.

i see a lot of this in my youngest brother's generation. those kids born from 1990 and above. the personalities of men and women of this age seem to be so similar, it's scary. it's like schools are removing genders altogether.

We have a skewed view of what a real man should be. He should be masculine, he should be a leader, he should be strong, he should be moral, caring, he should treat women with respect and dignity. He should control his own sexual passions etc. Tony Evans said it well in the video I posted. Real women are attracted to this kind of man. Messed up women like messed up men.
 
Read the part where I said the DA's require SLAM DUNK evidence to charge. Speak to a DA and ask them of the evidence threshold for charging someone with rape is anywhere near robbery, assault, drug crimes, etc. They will tell you sex crimes are much higher, unfairly higher in every social worker and dectectives opinion ive gotten, which is around a dozen people ive spoke with. Ask them if the reasoning for this is the pursuit of justice or lack of resources.

Forgive me for ignoring your anecdotal evidence. And we have thrown innocent men who were accused of rape into prison. I highly doubt slam dunk evidence is needed for every single rape case if innocent men are being sent to prison.

Then ask yourself if 80% percent of these girls, many very young kids, are going through the very long and usually tramatic process of trying to press rape charges as some form of malevolent lie and get turned down because they get caught in it, or if they get turned away because creepy uncle had a the 2 brain cells it takes not to leave cum and witnesses at the crime scene.

Evidence is evidence. You need it (or SHOULD need it) to convict someone accused of a crime. We can't send men to prison based solely on accusation.

As far as your comment about the girls having to go through multiple interviews with dectectives, you don't seem to understand the dectectives ascertain something did happen and give the approval to press charges and it's the DAs still shooting down 80% of these cases.

Once again, this is anecdotal evidence. I could easily spin my own story about all of this that I can't prove.
 
Whatever happened to just being crazy?
 
Whatever happened to just being crazy?

i think that crazy definitely exists. though i think that in the case of this rodger guy, his frustrations with women is what led him to becoming crazy. it seems that his entire life revolved around that one goal of being attractive to women, that it engulfed his entire life, and not knowing how to resolve this issue led to his craziness, and eventual downfall.

the pussification of men has created unattractive men to women, and men who are unable to attract females, something that is as innate and necessary to men as is eating, that it completely destroys them.
 
Last edited:
i think that crazy definitely exists. though i think that in this case of this rodger guy, his frustrations with women is what led him to becoming crazy. it seems that his entire life revolved around that one goal of being attractive to women, that it engulfed his entire life, and not knowing how to resolve this issue led to his craziness, and eventual downfall.

the pussification of men has created unattractive men to women, and men who are unable to attract females, something that is as innate and necessary to men as is eating, that it completely destroys them.

I agree.
 
i think that crazy definitely exists. though i think that in this case of this rodger guy, his frustrations with women is what led him to becoming crazy. it seems that his entire life revolved around that one goal of being attractive to women, that it engulfed his entire life, and not knowing how to resolve this issue led to his craziness, and eventual downfall.

the pussification of men has created unattractive men to women, and men who are unable to attract females, something that is as innate and necessary to men as is eating, that it completely destroys them.

I agree with this but I do have one caveat.

It's not just that we've created men who are unattractive to women. We've also created men who think they're entitled to a specific type of women. So they ignore realistic sexual opportunities to pursue fantasies they'll never realize.
 
I agree with this but I do have one caveat.

It's not just that we've created men who are unattractive to women. We've also created men who think they're entitled to a specific type of women. So they ignore realistic sexual opportunities to pursue fantasies they'll never realize.

I agree. IMO you can partially blame porn for that. It's everywhere now. No longer do you have to go to a special section of the store. It's on sports web pages, tv commercials after 9 pm, National Enquirer in grocery lines. I gotta turn magazines over in grocery store lines so my boy isn't staring at boobs and butts in thongs. Nearly every day you will encounter it to some degree. It wasn't in your face 20 years ago.
 
Back
Top