All the internet blathering in the world, is not going to change the fact that Fedor was never "known as one of the more elusive fighters in MMA ever." Lol.
Oh, the insults. Did I break you that quickly?
At least my condescension comes with some relevant argument. You're just firing wild as you scrabble for deflection.
This sort of thing really should be beneath you.
A low received punch stat doesn't mean someone is a highly elusive striker. Like you said, a grappling-heavy style accounts for that.
This is sheer desperation. You started this out by arguing for Ronda, and how much she doesn't get hit. If Ronda's style is not what you would call "grappling heavy" then I don't think you are qualified to discuss MMA.
Fedor spent far more time on the feet than Ronda, and he had far more fights, against better opposition. He still got hit less than almost anyone else in the sport.
Also:
I've seen every Fedor fight. His striking defense is okay, but certainly not exceptional. That was never his style. He would get in your face & seek to overwhelm his opponent, every time. He often took damage to do this. If anything, that aspect of him resembles Ronda.
Why weren't you mentioning his grappling heavy style here? In this post, Fedor gets hit a lot because he's "in your face" overwhelming you. But now, he didn't get hit a lot, because he grapples?
Should we try and find information on exactly how much time each fighter spends striking on the feet? Would that make you feel better about the fact that Fedor is leagues more elusive a fighter than Ronda?
The comparison isn't actually fair, but since you decided to make it, I don't feel too bad about that.
Oh, and the correct phrasing would be "If anything, that aspect of Ronda resembles Fedor" since, she's the one trying to copy him.
You'd be right, that aspect of her game does resemble his, only he was far better at it, far more elusive, and thus, in a far better position to offer his criticism of her than you are to offer your (demonstrably false) opinion of him.