- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 1,430
- Reaction score
- 0
Thankfully she didn't have to be stoned to death for being touched by a stranger, Allah is merciful.
It looks like another first. The state fire services department plans to recruit 50-odd women as firefighters who'll be tasked to rescue women trapped in fires. The move has been prompted by the death of a Muslim woman in a recent blaze at Kolutala in the city. Locals in the crowded locality refused to allow male firefighters to enter a blazing house to rescue her. Earlier too, such incidents have occurred. Fire services minister Pratim Chatterjee said the "physical contact necessitated" during a rescue had been the bone of contention. Chatterjee has already sent a draft proposal to the CM's secretariat for approval. "Once I get the green signal, I'll ensure some women are posted in fire stations, especially in Muslim localities," the minister said. There are 90-odd fire stations in the state, including 18 in Calcutta.
http://www.outlookindia.com/article/to-save-the-sisters/228310
Religion of pieceses....
...of shit.
Something's off here. So you're trying to tell me that two physically fit (I'm assuming) lifeguards were unable to make it out into the water because of one old guy? What the hell was he doing to stop them?
This has nothing to do with religion, but you lot will always leap on any chance you see to trash Islam. Nothing to see here.
If this isn't infraction-worthy, I don't know what is.
I'm talking about your misspelling of "pieces," of course: not your labeling of an entire 2 billion-person population as pieces of excrement based off a story that has nothing to do with religion.
If this isn't infraction-worthy, I don't know what is.
I'm talking about your misspelling of "pieces," of course: not your labeling of an entire 2 billion-person population as pieces of excrement based off a story that has nothing to do with religion.
Another "nothing to do with religion" guy.
Hey, if a republican guy physically restrained lifeguards in order to keep them from saving a drowning democrat, and the republican admitted he had done it because the drowning person was a democrat, would you say the event had nothing to do with politics?
Do the WR Awards have a prize for most forced and nonsensical analogy?
Literally, the ONLY thing mentioned about the father in the four source I've seen is that he is "Asian". I might as well proclaim that you only quoted me because you're a racist black who hates me because I'm white: I literally would have the same amount of substance to my argument.
But, yeah, you're not a racist piece of shit or anything.
Do the WR Awards have a prize for most forced and nonsensical analogy?
Literally, the ONLY thing mentioned about the father in the four source I've seen is that he is "Asian". I might as well proclaim that you only quoted me because you're a racist black who hates me because I'm white: I literally would have the same amount of substance to my argument.
But, yeah, you're not a racist piece of shit or anything.
So when a man makes a decision and acts in order to comply with his religious beliefs - a fact clearly stated to witnesses if the source is accurate - the decision and action should be seen as having nothing to do with religion?
Hey, if a white guy physically restrained lifeguards in order to keep them from saving a drowning black person, and the guy admitted he had done it because the person was black, would you say the event had nothing to do with racism?