- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 53,884
- Reaction score
- 30,885
How so?I don't think everyone has abandoned morality, but a frightening number of our 320 mil citizens definitely have.
How so?I don't think everyone has abandoned morality, but a frightening number of our 320 mil citizens definitely have.
Pretty soon we will run out of sky.Another sky is falling thread.
Pretty soon we will run out of sky.
I don't see how. If anything we've become more moral in many ways.
Wouldn't that amount to the same thing?
I reject your morality, and substitute it with my own.
Should we prepare for the goths attack or stop the spread of Christianity?
Our morality is in better shape today than ever. Misogyny is almost unacceptable and women's rights are improving, racism is down to a sliver of what it used to be, crime is down across the board, religions are losing power here, etc. All great things. There are some concerns with over-sentencing criminals and a pretty major concern about ownership of labor, but overall our moral situation is much better than it was when I was younger.
You can really only compare the Roman empire or any empire with the West today to a very limited degree because of the advancement in communication.
I can basically communicate with everyone in the western world instantly, how long did it took the empire to deliver a message to the front for example.
Because of the communication we have access to today most issues the Romans had dont apply to us.
Frank Zappa: "The eons are closing!"I guess it will be space then?
Re. boldedLong ass video, but very interesting from an economical and historical standpoint. There really are so many similarities to our current situation once you analyse things carefully. I think the clearest one is over-reliance on central planning and abandonment of morality/self-discipline.
We've also abandoned morally repugnant ideas.Sure, but depending on who's definition you're using, I'm sure we've abandoned many moral principles.
How would the fall of the West be part of that transition when its the West that has advanced globalism more than anyone else? The fall of the West would set the globalist project back a hundred years at least.I think we're transitioning into a more overt global empire rather than a Western one.
The 'fall of the West' is part of that transition.
How would the fall of the West be part of that transition when its the West that has advanced globalism more than anyone else? The fall of the West would set the globalist project back a hundred years at least.
Re. bolded
Well that depends....As far as promiscuity and clothing goes I can see why a lot of people would think morality has gone down. But in other areas like a more equitable society, we are far more moral now. We don't have segregation anymore, women are more empowered and less restricted by societal demands on what a woman must be , gays and transgender are better off now , minorities have better say in things.
Right. Screw the family unit, women can have soul crushing sex with 80 people before marriage now, do some porn, and demean men at work and wherever they please, and that's what matters. Government and banks and billionaires taking power from community Churches is just without question the right moral direction. Not sure if crime is down "across the board" if you include Europe.. And its terrorism. Also, if crime is down in America, let's be honest, it just shows you how much urban crime there was before, and how little people talked about it. Because Chicago's crime statistics couldn't be much worse. I will say this, in an attempt to find agreement with you, my kids aren't looking to be quite as bad as we were, in some ways. Everything revolves around the schools and school spirit.. Which is kind of good, and also secretely kind of lame and pathetic in a way. It's a sign our kids will be sheep, but they aren't out being as bad as I was; at least my kids. But then, you look at the heroin numbers of teens, and even that goes out the window.
I like your positive outlook.
No, its been the West. Namely France and Britain initially and more recently the US has taken the front seat. Sure corporate interests have aligned with this globalist agenda but its been pushed forth by the political class of these nations as well.It's not so much the West, as those in the drivers seat (private internationalists pushing globalism)
But why sacrifice the most stable region that also happens to be the seat of power for the multinational corporations and globalists?It's a small club. Sacrificing (or redistributing/reducing) some regions to gain the whole is just chess playing.