Opinion Explain the Great Reset to me

In Canada, Australia and the EU (among others) digital ID legislation started being introduced in 2020, in synchronicity with Covid and for good reason: you need upheaval to introduce something so damaging. This ties in with ID2020, a Bill Gates and Rockefeller program to have each person in the world have an irremovable biometric ID (iris, fingerprint, facial recognition) which can then be used by the government to track everything you do and everywhere you go. Facial and gait recognition software is so good cameras can track you with near 100% accuracy even if you're hiding your face. They're also putting a digital wallet inside digital ID, so they can know everything you purchase once they kill cash. They'll sell you some bullshit about it being more secure or some such, they're lying of course; it's all about control. From that point on, it's easy as cake to install a social credit system that removes your rights if you act in a way that goes contrary to what the government wants. Simply look at the truckers in Canada who got their assets frozen, that's a preview.

Ursula von der Leyen has been openly clamoring for the vaccine passport system to be transitioned into digital ID. Gates has talked many times how vaccination records can be used as a stepping stone to digital ID. Vaccine passports are already a form of social credit system because your rights are removed if you made a decision government didn't like. That's where this vaccine passport obsession comes from: they need it before it's what they plan on using to transition to digital ID, it's the alpha version of this future social credit system.
 
In Canada, Australia and the EU (among others) digital ID legislation started being introduced in 2020, in synchronicity with Covid and for good reason: you need upheaval to introduce something so damaging. This ties in with ID2020, a Bill Gates and Rockefeller program to have each person in the world have an irremovable biometric ID (iris, fingerprint, facial recognition) which can then be used by the government to track everything you do and everywhere you go. Facial and gait recognition software is so good cameras can track you with near 100% accuracy even if you're hiding your face. They're also putting a digital wallet inside digital ID, so they can know everything you purchase once they kill cash. They'll sell you some bullshit about it being more secure or some such, they're lying of course; it's all about control. From that point on, it's easy as cake to install a social credit system that removes your rights if you act in a way that goes contrary to what the government wants. Simply look at the truckers in Canada who got their assets frozen, that's a preview.

Ursula von der Leyen has been openly clamoring for the vaccine passport system to be transitioned into digital ID. Gates has talked many times how vaccination records can be used as a stepping stone to digital ID. Vaccine passports are already a form of social credit system because your rights are removed if you made a decision government didn't like. That's where this vaccine passport obsession comes from: they need it before it's what they plan on using to transition to digital ID, it's the alpha version of this future social credit system.

That's not what digital ID legislation in Australia is. It's just optional 2FA identity verification used to access online government services like welfare, tax returns and medicare, and centrally links all the data from those sources in a combined database.
There are no biometrics involved, there are no financial transactions recorded aside from the payments they make through those services.
If it's expanded, it'll be for use as online identity certification for use in the private sector.
The ancillary legislation is mostly about the creation and compliance with Australian data regulation for the storage and access to personal data. For instance tightening up on data sovereignty, making it illegal to offshore the data hosting or share the data with international companies. Hosting compliance and regulation, incident reporting etc.
Of course there's debate over whether such information should be centralised at all, but proposed alternatives like putting it on an encrypted blockchain are dubious.
 
What is being marketed is not what will be implemented.

Think, "Patriot Act" or "Homeland Security", or most recently, "COVID relief Bill"

It's the world economic forum. Nothing will be implemented. It's a toothless talking head.
 
That's not what digital ID legislation in Australia is. It's just optional 2FA identity verification used to access online government services like welfare, tax returns and medicare, and centrally links all the data from those sources in a combined database.
There are no biometrics involved, there are no financial transactions recorded aside from the payments they make through those services. The ancillary legislation is mostly about the creation and compliance with Australian data regulation for the storage and access to personal data. For instance tightening up on data sovereignty, making it illegal to offshore the data hosting or share the data with international companies.
Of course there's debate over whether such information should be centralised at all, but proposed alternatives like putting it on an encrypted blockchain are dubious.

There is no [insert element]... yet. It's not mandatory... yet. It's not a badge of honour to be unable to connect obvious dots and refuse to see what's waiting for you, one or two steps in the future. Australia is already two steps removed from a full-blown police state, but I understand that some people will maintain a stance of denial until the very end. Not much else to say.

In Canada they're not coy about it. Ontario has already rolled out digital ID, and Quebec is introducing their digital ID in June - they want full biometrics, they're chunking in a digital wallet (for those sweet CBDC I'm sure) and they'll even put government papers and insurance in there. The western provinces are keeping to pilot projects for now, probably because acceptance is lower.
 
There is no [insert element]... yet. It's not mandatory... yet. It's not a badge of honour to be unable to connect obvious dots and refuse to see what's waiting for you, one or two steps in the future. Australia is already two steps removed from a full-blown police state, but I understand that some people will maintain a stance of denial until the very end. Not much else to say.

In Canada they're not coy about it. Ontario has already rolled out digital ID, and Quebec is introducing their digital ID in June - they want full biometrics, they're chunking in a digital wallet (for those sweet CBDC I'm sure) and they'll even put government papers and insurance in there. The western provinces are keeping to pilot projects for now, probably because acceptance is lower.

Nonsense. Have you ever been to an actual authoritarian state?
In Australia's case "digital" just means online. Online identity verification is hardly new or particularly scary, although the convergence of government data storage is new.
Are you IT literate? Legislation like the GDPR and frameworks like the TDIF (which is just an accreditation standard, not the actual Government verified online identity being mandated for online transactions) are a response to the growing online economy and provision of online services. Which is precisely why the pandemic made them more of a concern. If anything they are lagging behind when it comes to regulating things like hosting standards and incident reporting of data breaches. They will retain the option of rocking up to an office with your passport, birth certificate and driver's licence to sign up for Government services, but most people will stop doing that simply as a matter of convenience.
If you really cared about privacy and tracking you wouldn't have a mobile phone and you'd abstain from using a visible static IP service to access the internet.
There is no more "assumption of privacy", there's only the privacy you personally establish and secure.
 
There is no [insert element]... yet. It's not mandatory... yet. It's not a badge of honour to be unable to connect obvious dots and refuse to see what's waiting for you, one or two steps in the future. Australia is already two steps removed from a full-blown police state, but I understand that some people will maintain a stance of denial until the very end. Not much else to say.

In Canada they're not coy about it. Ontario has already rolled out digital ID, and Quebec is introducing their digital ID in June - they want full biometrics, they're chunking in a digital wallet (for those sweet CBDC I'm sure) and they'll even put government papers and insurance in there. The western provinces are keeping to pilot projects for now, probably because acceptance is lower.
Ontarian here

What digital ID are you talking about?
 
I dont see how they will do this in America but I guess they're welcome to try.
This is why we have the 2nd amendment.
 
This is a pretty good real ELI5, only 15 mins.



That segment with Dr Yuval Noah Harari is surreal.

They're not hiding their intentions at all, but people will still come to their defense, downplay it, or disbelieve, all because they just refuse to see what's right in front of their faces.

It's a form of self imposed blindness, that I have to believe is a product of a deep seeded fear of the reality of such things being true. What a crazy thing to witness occurring on such a massive scale.

These people will inevitably enable what they scoff at as being possible.
 
That segment with Dr Yuval Noah Harari is surreal.

They're not hiding their intentions at all, but people will still come to their defense, downplay it, or disbelieve, all because they just refuse to see what's right in front of their faces.

It's a form of self imposed blindness, that I have to believe is a product of a deep seeded fear of the reality of such things being true. What a crazy thing to witness occurring on such a massive scale.

These people will inevitably enable what they scoff at as being possible.

For the worse cases they would probably feel comfortable under such a totalitarian system because there's nobody home already. You can't miss having individuality and freedom if you were never using yours in the first place. We would feel stifled but they would feel nothing. That's why it seems impossible for any step by the government to make them feel uncomfortable; they're 100% on board with the groupthink. Whatever happens, they're for it and they'll make excuses for it. As evidenced by the Covid era, they don't care at all about slippery slopes or being proven wrong repeatedly. Basically some people are just write-offs.
 
Imagine the world is a NES now imagine your older sister beat you at a game , so you get angry and hit the reset button before the results are shown.
Now imagine that on a global scale.
Oh yeah and lizard people always lizard people.

Bloody Lizard people < shakes fist at sky >
 
Why are Americans so obsessed with communism but have no idea what it entails.
 
Why are Americans so obsessed with communism but have no idea what it entails.
Most communists have no idea what communism entails either.
 
I don't see any issue with any of the goals stated there. I started the thread because I'm open minded as to what other information people can provide (as long as it's reasonably sourced).

I don't have a concrete opinion yet.
The great reset real world people are talking about in the given context is totally different from the widely disseminated misstatement of the term coopted into a CT for the right-wing-loony-extremist to latch onto and blow up into the Next Big Threat to white America.
https://www.bbc.com/news/55017002
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57532368
What is the Great Reset - and how did it get hijacked by conspiracy theories?

"A vague set of proposals from an influential organisation has been transformed by online conspiracy theorists into a powerful viral rallying cry. What is the truth behind the "Great Reset"?

Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians - a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world.

Despite all the contradictions in the last sentence, thousands online have latched on to this latest reimagining of an old conspiracy theory - updated for the age of Covid."
 
The great reset real world people are talking about in the given context is totally different from the widely disseminated misstatement of the term coopted into a CT for the right-wing-loony-extremist to latch onto and blow up into the Next Big Threat to white America.
https://www.bbc.com/news/55017002
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57532368
What is the Great Reset - and how did it get hijacked by conspiracy theories?

"A vague set of proposals from an influential organisation has been transformed by online conspiracy theorists into a powerful viral rallying cry. What is the truth behind the "Great Reset"?

Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians - a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world.

Despite all the contradictions in the last sentence, thousands online have latched on to this latest reimagining of an old conspiracy theory - updated for the age of Covid."


Ummm... Literally the most effective sanctions against Russia have been those not enacted by any governments........ just financial institutions
 
It's like they designed the perfect conspiracy theory bait, and then made it real.
 
Back
Top