Law EU: forbidden to say "father" and "mother" as well as "gay", "homosexual", "lesbian" or "trans"

Broadcast

Banned
Banned
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
9,094
Reaction score
828
a07d9a2e903f43a38cf83a5eabd645.jpg


The goal is to impose the progressive neo-language on the whole bureaucratic class of the European Union. The new language adopted by the European Parliament is an "inclusive" language that is respectful of gender minorities (LGBT). As well persons with disabilities, race, ethnicity and religion.

From now on, they should no longer be used, especially for the LGBT people:
  1. It is forbidden to say "gays, homosexuals and lesbians" . More accommodating expressions such as "gay people, homosexual people, lesbian people" must be used.
  2. The expression "same-sex marriage" must be replaced by the term "egalitarian marriage".
  3. In the new language, it is incorrect to talk about "gay rights": They must be replaced by "fair and equal treatment".
  4. In the new language we have "sex assigned at birth" and not "biological sex".
  5. It is also wrong to talk about "sex change", which is now becoming a "gender transition".
  6. Terms such as "father" and "mother" should simply become "parents".
 
5th, 6th: the funniest! Basically it will protect also those who are mentally ill, it encourages this "gender transition" even though it would not be right. And today it"s not recognized anymore the "procreation", which is a natural act between man and woman.

I hope I am not homophobic or something, just analyzing their new regulations.

Not to mention others are a privileged category. We are not "heterosexual people", not even "heterosexuals". In this diversity.

This "egalitarian marriage" also sounds like it gives them more rights. As if they are above.

4th is related to 6th. 3rd to 2nd.
 
Last edited:
Came to be outraged at more woke bullshit, but to be honest aside point 6 (that nobody will ever apply) they did'nt gone SO full retard this round, mostly useless changes

Changes on immigration wording has been way more slimy
 
5th, 6th: the funniest! Basically it will protect also those who are mentally ill, it encourages this "gender transition" even though it would not be right. And today it"s not recognized anymore the "procreation", which is a natural act between man and woman.

I hope I am not homophobic or something, just analyzing their new regulations.

Not to mention others are a privileged category. We are not "heterosexual people", not even "heterosexuals". In this diversity.

This "egalitarian marriage" also sounds like it gives them more rights. As if they are above.

4th is related to 6th.

I don't think it encourages it really. Who's going to go out and get a sex change because the EU now refers to it as a gender transition?
 
I don't think it encourages it really. Who's going to go out and get a sex change because the EU now refers to it as a gender transition?
Go to Thailand to see how many ladyboys are sane. But, hey, it is their right to make this transition if they want! Just not on state money, no one asks me if I want to pay for people with mental health problems.

I am not even a doctor to comment on other cases of sex change.

But to consider that ALL are certainly normal, certainly encourages them. As for state-paid surgeries, they should work with psychologists and psychiatrists. To see if it is required. Yet again I am no doctor.

What ideas do Germany and the Netherlands have, I would not be surprised if we didn"t exist as human beings. It could become general. Politicians are just a small group of people who think they are gods. Nobody asks us this through referendums.
 
Go to Thailand to see how many ladyboys are sane. But, hey, it is their right to make this transition if they want! Just not on state money, no one asks me if I want to pay for people with mental health problems.

I am not even a doctor to comment on other cases of sex change.

But to consider that all are certainly normal, certainly encourages them. As for state-paid surgeries, they should work with psychologists and psychiatrists. To see if it is required. Yet again I am no doctor.

What ideas do Germany and the Netherlands have, I would not be surprised if we didn"t exist as human beings. It could become general. Politicians are just a small group of people who think they are gods. Nobody asks us this through referendums.

They're not going to transition just because they change the language by a couple of words, though. Maybe there's other interesting stuff going on, but I don't think this is it.
 
Cannot say "gays, homosexuals, lesbians". Instead "gay people, homosexual people, lesbian people."

The only logical conclusion is that there was previously confusion as to whether it was humans they were referring to.

We obviously should have seen this coming when the hippie teacher from Beavis and Butthead sang the "Lesbian Seagull" song...
 
At some point you've got to ask yourself, how is it that this movement has so much power behind it?
It is out of control and it is pushed by the real elites that are behind. Too little scientific foundation, just neo-Marxist ideas. It is as if a Hitler pushes his personal and subjective ideas, and someone executes them. And the people are just slaves everywhere because of the politicians.

But what are the politicians, gods? Unfortunately, today there are only economic revolutions in the more civilized world.
 
So which European language is this new inclusive language of Europe actually going to be in, or will it simply be applied equally and fairly to all languages spoken in Europe?

What about gendered names? I know Scandinavian countries aren't in the EU, but would this law force people to refer to Mr Gunnerson as "Xe Gunnerparent"?
 
Back
Top