Well they were supposed to fight before, but Perez fought someone else (forgot who), then he fought Bloodworth after he won anyway.
The fight was good and everything, but how on earth does it come after Guillard-Varner on the card?
Perez vs. the loser of Jorgensen vs. Wineland sounds good to me.
The fight was good and everything, but how on earth does it come after Guillard-Varner on the card?
he did all of that while hungry
As cynical as you sound, I tend to agree. I hate the business-bias of the UFC.They will try to build him up with fights against newcomers or average fighters to get some of the hispanic demographic. He looks pretty good though, I am impressed.
As cynical as you sound, I tend to agree. I hate the business-bias of the UFC.
I don't see the comparison. Roger wasn't as young as Erik nor did he finished his fights like Erik did.
Perez finishing fights yet again, the guy's a beast, stop hating.