What fine journalism you peruse. They can't even use a spellcheck or capitalize at the start of a sentence.
"There was an October Surprise in 2020. The media just suffocated it with a pillow. Hunter Biden’s emails exposed what appears to be a pretty extensive history of corruption from the Bide family."
The emails show nothing of the sort from Joe Bide in addition to Joe Biden.
"The emails were unearthed by The New York Post. They were found on Hunter’s laptop that he left at a local repair shop in Wilmington in 2019. He simply forgot to pick it up."
Uh huh. And Hunter left stickers all over them, I suppose in braille, so the blind repairman could identify whose computer they were. How convenient.
"the owner of the shop made a copy of the hard drive and turned a copy over to Rudy Giuliani’s lawyer and sent the device to the FBI. Was it a big deal? Well, Twitter and Facebook moved quickly to censor the story for no other reason than it made Joe Biden look bad."
No other reason? They had no other concerns then "this makes Joe Biden look bad!" I suppose that's why Fox News passed on the story as well - they didn't want to make Joe look bad! How magnanimous of them!
"Now, the Media Research City polled over 1,000 Biden supporters from several key states and found a staggering amount would have bolted from Creepy Joe if they had known about the shady deals with Burisma in Ukraine and their venture in China with a company with, no shock, ties to an untrustworthy government. The Biden doctrine appears to be get paid first and then ask questions later, but the media didn’t care. As they did with Obama and the IRS, Solyndra, and Benghazi, the media is going to unveil a wide security blanket to shield this administration from controversy. For God’s sake folks, we have stories about how the Bidens plan on buying cats. I’m not kidding. One could wonder what the numbers would be like if we had an unbiased media. Sadly, we don’t. There’s us—and a massive complex of Democratic operatives doing their part at
CBS, NBC, ABC, and other major outlets. Here’s what the MRC found:"
I wait with bated breath. I've never heard of this Media Research Center. Let's Google:
"The organization rejects the
scientific consensus on climate change, and criticizes media coverage that reflects the scientific consensus...The MRC received over $10 million from
Robert Mercer, its largest single donor...The MRC has been a critic of the
video game industry, arguing that there is a
link between violent videogames and real-world violence; in this capacity, they (along with the
Parents Television Council, a subsidiary) were invited to President
Donald Trump's 2018 summit on video games and gun violence... the Media Research Center bestowed an award named for
William F. Buckley to
Sean Hannity,"
Moving on...here is the "pollster":
"The left-wing news media didn’t just poison the information environment with their incessantly negative coverage of President Trump going into the 2020 election. They also refused to give airtime to important arguments of the Republican campaign — both pro-Trump and anti-Biden — which meant millions of voters cast their ballots knowing only what the media permitted them to know about the candidates.
To measure the true effect of the media’s censorship on the election, the Media Research Center asked The Polling Company to survey 1,750 Biden voters in seven swing states"
They sound really objective!!
So, in the poll they say evidence exists which directly links Joe Biden to tens of millions in illegal profits, then ask if the Biden voters were aware of this, would they still vote for him? Some, understandably, say no (if this online poll is even real). Problem is, it's a lie that evidence exists which links Biden to tens of millions in illegal profits. It's like asking MMA fans, "would you still consider Fedor the HW Goat if you knew Ronda Rousey arm barred in a fight, which we totally have evidence of?!?!?!"
This is idiotic and you should be ashamed of yourself.
