Eddie Alvarez DQ Loss to No Contest. Will UFC follow?

[New Yorkido]

Will UFC right the wrong and follow the suit in Yan vs Aljo case? This seems like a fair deeds and makes common sense. Most fans and MMA dawgs will agree except for the "Looser" in this - The fake champ Aljo. One should never "WIN" via illegal actions of another! Discuss.
Eddie Alvarez DQ Loss to Iuri Lapicus at One on TNT 1 Overturned to No Contest

 

[surgeyou1]

The guy turned his head on purpose so Eddie would hit him in the back.

Not sure what that has to do with Sterling getting blasted with the most illegal knee ever.

 

[Fight Professor]

Yan knew the opponent was grounded. The ref told him that.

 

[Fatback96]

UFC doesn’t have any control over that, because they actually have a commission in place that regulates what they do.

ONE on the other hand probably has no commission regulating and therefore can basically do whatever they want. Kinda sketch.

 

[Bvr]

No

 

[Kvothe_the_kingkiller]

Will UFC right the wrong and follow the suit in Yan vs Aljo case? This seems like a fair deeds and makes common sense. Most fans and MMA dawgs will agree except for the "Looser" in this - The fake champ Aljo. Discuss.
Eddie Alvarez DQ Loss to Iuri Lapicus at One on TNT 1 Overturned to No Contest

No.

I could see something like Frank Shamrock v Renzo Gracie (the meaty part of Frank's thigh hit Renzo in the back of his head while he was on top of Frank in half guard, and Herb Dean called it a foul and the doc claimed Renzo couldn't continue) being changed to a NC. But not that Yan knee. No way, no how.

 

[Kvothe_the_kingkiller]

UFC doesn’t have any control over that, because they actually have a commission in place that regulates what they do.

ONE on the other hand probably has no commission regulating and therefore can basically do whatever they want. Kinda sketch.

no probably about it.

 

[MeatWagon06]

“Loosers” will getcha every time.

Completely different situations in those fights.. Happy for Eddie though.

 

[Arnold Palmer]

The Ref did a poor job is one the main reasons.

Eddie did as well IMO and took advantage of the position.

hard to believe that you've fought all these years including training and had Zero idea his head was turned.

Also if you had zero idea where his head was then slamming punches in that direction was just stupid as you put yourself in DQ danger.


Ref dropped the ball mainly though

 

[avenue94]

Will UFC right the wrong and follow the suit in Yan vs Aljo case? This seems like a fair deeds and makes common sense. Most fans and MMA dawgs will agree except for the "Looser" in this - The fake champ Aljo. One should never "WIN" via illegal actions of another! Discuss.
Eddie Alvarez DQ Loss to Iuri Lapicus at One on TNT 1 Overturned to No Contest

Well given One is its own commission, no.

 

[D'z]

Not a fan of Aljo....but Yan was dead wrong in this example. No getting around it.

 

[D'z]

The Ref did a poor job is one the main reasons.

Eddie did as well IMO and took advantage of the position.

hard to believe that you've fought all these years including training and had Zero idea his head was turned.

Also if you had zero idea where his head was then slamming punches in that direction was just stupid as you put yourself in DQ danger.


Ref dropped the ball mainly though

It's obvious you've never been in an actual fight.

 

[Shaddows]

Will UFC right the wrong and follow the suit in Yan vs Aljo case? This seems like a fair deeds and makes common sense. Most fans and MMA dawgs will agree except for the "Looser" in this - The fake champ Aljo. One should never "WIN" via illegal actions of another! Discuss.
Eddie Alvarez DQ Loss to Iuri Lapicus at One on TNT 1 Overturned to No Contest

I think that disqualifications should not count for title shots.
The champion should retain his/her belt, and an immediate rematch should ensue though.

 

[New Yorkido]

Not a fan of Aljo....but Yan was dead wrong in this example. No getting around it.

Yan was wrong, no question, but granting Aljo a WIN on his record is wrong too. the only case the Win is debatable IF Aljo was winning on judges records. not even close. WIN is a fucken WIN, not because the other dude fucked up. please separate the two: one did wrong (Yan), the other one did NOT WIN (Aljo). Capisce?

 

[Arnold Palmer]

It's obvious you've never been in an actual fight.

that's your stupidity shinning so bright

you can't tell when a guy turns his head against yours ?

let alone know that if you throw "blind" punches you have a chance of hitting back of head ?

You can give him benefit of doubt if youd like but dirty alvarez been a cheap fighter

 

[New Yorkido]

I think that disqualifications should not count for title shots.
The champion should retain his/her belt, and an immediate rematch should ensue though.

Shaddows is the only sherbro with brains in this room! you get me and I get you!

 

[D'z]

Yan was wrong, no question, but granting Aljo a WIN on his record is wrong too. the only case the Win is debatable IF Aljo was winning on judges records. not even close. WIN is a fucken WIN, not because the other dude fucked up. please separate the two: one did wrong (Yan), the other one did NOT WIN (Aljo). Capisce?

When you cheat, you lose. Aljo won because his opponent cheated. Capisce?

 

[D'z]

that's your stupidity shinning so bright

you can't tell when a guy turns his head against yours ?

I stand by my statement. It really is obvious.

 

[Arnold Palmer]

I stand by my statement. It really is obvious.

You are the statement

Dumb asf obviously

 

[D'z]

You are the statement

Dumb asf obviously

Good one.