Economics

Discussion in 'Mayberry Lounge' started by $uperman, Jul 30, 2015.

  1. $uperman Black Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,580
    Likes Received:
    71
    Is economics philosophy or a science?

    I taught it was a science, but Alain de Botton said this:

    " Economics is – at its most serious – a branch of philosophy. It shouldn’t just be the neutral study of ‘economic growth’. It should be the study of how growth can promote human flourishing: "
     
  2. Dogstarman Old man jiu jitsu

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    11,576
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On the mats
     
  3. zackryder Long Island Iced Z Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2012
    Messages:
    11,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Long Island, New York
  4. Iroh The Dragon of the West Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    38,843
    Likes Received:
    4,325
    Location:
    Spirit World
    It's the art of making money.
     
  5. Uchi Mata Preaching the gospel of heel hooks and left kicks

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    18,578
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    It's not a science, at least, not most of it. The problem of demarcation is a huge issue in the philosophy of science, but by most criteria economics doesn't meet it. At best it's soft science as experimentation is very hard for most economic problems and many economic schools of thought have proved totally immune to falsifiability. Marxism or the Austrian school are much more akin to Freudian psychoanalysis or astrology than they are to physics, in the sense that there are no definitive tests of the theory which overthrow the theory, rather the theory is just constantly modified to include any conceivable event which occurs.

    That said, calling economics philosophy or a soft science is not to call it useless. There certainly is some validity to microeconomics, econometrics, and some of the more basic tenets of macroeconomics (or so I think history demonstrates). But in terms of providing testable predictions that overthrow economic paradigms? That never seems to happen. As far as I can tell no economist ever changes their core views no matter how badly they turn out to align with reality.
     
  6. wlu29 Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    19,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    taught =/= thought
     
  7. DyslexicDave Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    775
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Angels of City
    Pseudoscience much like ghost hunting
     
  8. Cubo de Sangre President of the War Room

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2014
    Messages:
    46,166
    Likes Received:
    5,145
    Location:
    Hell
    I'd call it a social science.
     
  9. Osculater Red Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    8,102
    Likes Received:
    1,205
    ^^ there you go, monica.

    Economics falls under social sciences.
     
  10. CC's left foot Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2006
    Messages:
    10,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Economics boils down to individual human action, which can't be put into mathematical equations beyond doing statistics. You can count on people acting in their own self interest, but that self interest is fickle and isn't always rational when viewed from an outside POV.

    I think this is why macro econ reeks so strongly of bullshit. There is no macro, only micro multiplied seven billion times.
     
  11. Doughbelly αlpha-nerdette, action scientist

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    15,817
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    2nd Star to the Right & straight on til morning.
    Sounds like string theory to me and we call that shit is physics.

    Microeconomics is real, but no one has actually observed macroeconomics.
     
  12. Khabib Khanate Hashashiyan Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Messages:
    42,357
    Likes Received:
    8,384
    Location:
    Pleasure Dome
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Osculater Red Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2013
    Messages:
    8,102
    Likes Received:
    1,205
    Macroeconomics is just a theory?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.