- Joined
- Nov 6, 2002
- Messages
- 488
- Reaction score
- 0
[YT]watch?v=l2RByG_vutE[/YT]
I thought David Friedman won. He's a much better public speaker than Robert Murphy and his argument was more persuasive.
David had a convincing argument on how important empiricism is in economics.
At 24:22, David blow's up Robert's Euclidean geometry argument by arguing that tests are needed to know if whether or not the universe is flat. That PhD in physics came in handy during that moment of the debate.
I thought David Friedman won. He's a much better public speaker than Robert Murphy and his argument was more persuasive.
David had a convincing argument on how important empiricism is in economics.
At 24:22, David blow's up Robert's Euclidean geometry argument by arguing that tests are needed to know if whether or not the universe is flat. That PhD in physics came in handy during that moment of the debate.
Last edited: