Media Dustin on fighting Chandler for the title: It doesn't mean sense no disrespect but go fight Oliveira

Peli

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Jun 2, 2020
Messages
15,437
Reaction score
26,707

He believes it doesn't make sense that Chandler gets a title shot beating a guy that he just previously beat.

Guarantees he won't be fighting chandler.
 
Last edited:
Chandler charles justin and connor 4 way death match to fight dustin for belt
 
I mean, his reasoning makes some sense. But it’s gotta be Chandler or Oliveira for the belt, only top 5 guys not coming off losses.
Chandler should NOT get a UFC title shot by just beating Hooker. Poirier had to grind his way to it, Gaethje had to grind his way to it & Oliveira is still grinding his way to it.

Chandler getting one by a (good) win over (passive) Dan Hooker would be unfair in so many ways.
 
I mean, his reasoning makes some sense. But it’s gotta be Chandler or Oliveira for the belt, only top 5 guys not coming off losses.
it does make sense, but it doesn't make cents.

Its prize fighting so dana will want to book chandler vs dustin and giving conor a number 1 contender match.
 
mcgregorbernie-780x470.jpg
 
Chandler should NOT get a UFC title shot by just beating Hooker. Poirier had to grind his way to it, Gaethje had to grind his way to it & Oliveira is still grinding his way to it.

Chandler getting one by a (good) win over (passive) Dan Hooker would be unfair in so many ways.

I agree with you. Poirier vs. Oliveira for the belt makes the most sense. Chandler vs. Gaethje for the next shot.
 
Chandler charles justin and connor 4 way death match to fight dustin for belt
Or just Charles and Mike. Justin and Conor need to go earn that kind of opportunity.

I think it's silly to dismiss Chandler's whole career, but a the same time, he should't leapfrog Oliveira.

This would all be easier if Khabib would just fight Dustin against and let the other two settle it on the undercard.
 
Poirier beat Eddie much more impressively than chandler did.

Barboza also beat hooker much more impressively than poirier did.

MMA math doesn't work.

You talking about the 1st time when Eddie had Dustin done when he exploited the one hand one the ground rule or the rematch?

Fact is Dustin was getting worked by Hooker while Chandler dusted him off like nothing.
 
Chandler should NOT get a UFC title shot by just beating Hooker. Poirier had to grind his way to it, Gaethje had to grind his way to it & Oliveira is still grinding his way to it.

Chandler getting one by a (good) win over (passive) Dan Hooker would be unfair in so many ways.

Not sure why you added passive there but Chandler is 34 and was brought in to make big fights, not work his way up. They aren't paying him to fuck around.
 
We'll see what Dana and Sean Shelby have to say about that.

Only certain fighters can call the shots
 
Oliveira absolutely deserves the next shot, he shouldn't have to fight anyone else.
The man is on a 8 fight win streak with 7 finishes and an utter domination over Tony.
 
I'm not against Dustin vs Chuck, but he shouldn't act so high and mighty when Chandler beat Hooker much more impressively than he did.
Yeah but he just got here.
Dustin just koed mcgregor 3.0 so he calls the shots unless daddy comes back.

giphy.webp
 
lol dustin not even a champ and he's already acting like a fucking diva

dustin beat a guy who hasn't won a fight at 155 in four and a half years. what makes him think he can call the shots??

chandler will destroy dustin diamond and prove that Bellator owns UFC
 
lol dustin not even a champ and he's already acting like a fucking diva

dustin beat a guy who hasn't won a fight at 155 in four and a half years. what makes him think he can call the shots??

chandler will destroy dustin diamond and prove that Bellator owns UFC
Yeah based on all the shows bellator has put on recently
 
Back
Top