As I've been scrolling through the lineal UFC LW lineage I've noticed there are guys that should be getting a highlight that they actually don't. What about the fights that are neither won, nor lost?? Because I find it very offensive for such guys to not be getting the attention they need to. As I'm watching the stats it looks like Frankie Edgar steamrolled over some guy named Gray Maynard. But the reality was it was a very two-sided trilogy and they are actually 1-1-1 between their fights. I don't think fighter should keep his belt if it happens to be draw. You know... It puts the second fighter in a losing situation anyways. As he actually doesnt have a Draw on his record but a L. Because in lineal history thats how it looks like. There must be proclaimed 2 champions... because that's what it is. Neither one comes on top. They are both equal, so they must be both champions. If it's not a title fight a Draw looks like a draw.. but when it's a title fight then one guy gets privilidged over another one, even though it's a Draw (the same situation). Same happened when BJ Penn obviously had a draw with Caol Uno.. There was no official champion proclaimed. Either this or that..