Social DR James Cantor, Canadian clinical psychologist and sexologist pushes for Pedophiles rights

 
MMAViewer said:
Well you can Google it yourself or I can post hundreds of these to prove you wrong.
But you would still stick your head in the sand on this and we both know it.
https://www.star-telegram.com/living/religion/article222576310.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-evangelical-church/?utm_term=.f995b5e6f228

https://www.christianitytoday.com/n...damentalist-baptist-church-abuse-scandal.html

Hell rip there is even a book about it!

https://www.amazon.com/Big-Book-Bad-Baptist-Preachers/dp/1518883664
Click to expand...
412 allegations over several decades in the USA and Canada. If that's maybe150,000-200,000 different baptist churches over a 60 year period. In all of North America. That's pretty dang rare. A Baptist church is one of the safest you can be in.
 
Ripskater said:
412 allegations over several decades in the USA and Canada. If that's maybe150,000-200,000 different baptist churches over a 60 year period. In all of North America. That's pretty dang rare. A Baptist church is one of the safest you can be in.
Click to expand...


No rip, that was just 200 churches that all those allegations came from. That's an average of 2 per church. Is that safe in your opinion?

Here is what it said for reference.
"The series uncovered 412 allegations of abuse across nearly 200 churches and institutions, "
 
I believe pedos have a right, to a slow painful death
 
MMAViewer said:
No rip, that was just 200 churches that all those allegations came from. That's an average of 2 per church. Is that safe in your opinion?

Here is what it said for reference.
"The series uncovered 412 allegations of abuse across nearly 200 churches and institutions, "
Click to expand...
You can't run a good study by searching news and police reports and doing your study like this.

"Hey we looked at 20 churches in the news that had sex abuse reports. And found 40 victims. That means there are 2 abuse victims from every church!" That's not accurate at all.
 
Ripskater said:
You can't run a good study by searching news and police reports and doing your study like this.

"Hey we looked at 20 churches in the news that had sex abuse reports. And found 40 victims. That means there are 2 abuse victims from every church!" That's not accurate at all.
Click to expand...
Whats not accurate is your quote.
Read the post rip it was 412 allegation across 200 churches. It's simple mmath. On top of that I can post hundreds of other articles from a multitude of different sources and you know it...
But you are sold out to your religion, closed off to an open mind.
And you have an odd fascination with strong black athletic women and the transgender community.
 
IDL said:
Transgenderism is a real phenomenon in the world, yes I agree. That doesn't have anything to do with anything I said though.

I don't view it as hijacking (although there is always some of that), so much as the use of sort of 'meat shield' in advancing larger social engineering and ideological goals from the people at the top who push it. It can also be viewed as astroturfing.

It makes it more difficult for the average person to understand what's going on because all they see is a movement for the oppressed, but it is really just a veneer that wraps around other goals.

But it sounds like we at least agree that there are elements within 'the push' or 'the movement' that are not genuinely looking out for <insert group here>. This goes with all the LGBT stuff. I don't think the transgenderism push is about trans-gendered people at all really. It would be for some ground level activists who subscribe to the ideological stuff, but from a large scale international engineering program, no it isn't about them. I agree with the wording in your post regarding the upper echelon using progressive language for a different aim.

It wouldn't simply be about money if there is legislative pushes, school curriculum pushes, and all that. It's an engineering program and the transgender push is just a subset of it.
Click to expand...

You ever talk to @TheGreatA?

I'm gonna refrain from the (even) bigger picture you're drawing aside from the outsized commerce connection - for now - but it has been hijacked and the internal war over it was settled about a decade ago with the ENDA debacle. I remember John Aravosis penning an article on Salon asking what the hell he has in common with a man who wants to cut off his penis, surgically construct a vagina, and live as a woman. He was eviscerated for it. These billionaire powerbrokers, lobby organizations and "activist" drones just recently raked Martina Navratilova over the coals for this shit.

What Gives The Trans Lobby The Right To Chastise Martina Navratilova?

They don't fucking have one, not ever.

IDL said:
Your position probably represents the sane middle ground. The live and let live approach. The core political aspect of it though does seem to be focused on 'upending heteronormative society', like you say.

And when viewed in the larger context with all the race theory, critical theory, etc that is part of the same ideological package (as it is financed and pushed) it is more than just 'heteronormative society' it is Western society in general. The package is rightly recognized as NeoMarxist in flavor. That is, agitating a long race, gender, cultural, etc lines rather than traditional class lines in order to try to generate upheaval (sort of like cultural revolution that was used in China). These are recipes of empire. Formula.

ultimately from what I can see, the tactic is large scale subversion, which in large part is used as a way of a small wealthy elite to capture and control much larger societies at large without direct conflict. As such, those who are used as the 'meat shields' (say Transgenders currently) will inevitably be thrown under the bus because they are not the ones controlling it and it isn't really for them. A means to an end.
Click to expand...

Some of my views would probably be considered overtly "patriarchal" today and I do tend to view masculinity as a cornerstone of strong civilizations and cultures, which should be openly celebrated. As virtually the entire history of European art did, perpetually fixated on the idealized male image (better aesthetics). It's really the upending and deconstruction of masculinity more so than 'heteronormativity' because the two aren't always mutually inclusive. You may not believe that given a certain feminist infused and cultivated public image of a 'community' you think you know, but uh, subcultures and such.

Fugazy said:
Well I've got some doozies, I take it that you just haven't seen them.

Sure LGB people have contributed, no denying that.

And I think most people in that community probably want to live lives like most other people where they just want peace, some measure of success and security and to have some fun.

But, for many of them, especially those in the west who essentially have free reign to live a safe, progressive, decadent way of life, I do disagree with their way of life, I dislike it and I feel that there is a lot wrong with those LGB peoples. But ultimately, I do know a lot of them, and outside of that detail, some of them are fine people. It's not really my place to judge and while I will try in small ways to avoid them, I won't treat them differently or try to change them. You can be as gay as humanly possible, if you are a reliable person who is honest and kind, then I don't really care.

I do think that the promotion of that way of life throughout society is in fact a bad thing and it taking chunks of society down the wrong path. The lifestyle is a dead end, it does not beget life. And far too many of them revel in their debauchery and center their entire identity around it. People are easily swayed. Young idiots who wouldn't otherwise give 2 shits about the lgbt life hear and see propaganda constantly pushing them as unique and special, and lastly, victims, and are drawn to it before they know fuckall about life.
Click to expand...

Probably right on that though it wasn't intended as some kind of criticism bro, nor to imply you're thoughtless or cold and obviously not. Most of your content that I've seen is just fairly blunt and wastes no time in getting to the point. It's respectable. As an aside, I had no idea you were latino or a life long Democrat (wat?) until a few days ago.
 
Last edited:
DR James Cantor, Canadian clinical psychologist and sexologist pushes for Pedophiles rights.
What about the rights of children not to be molested and/or sodomized?
 
I'm a big believer in pedophile rights - their right to chose between an electric chair or a firing squad.
 
NoDak said:
You ever talk to @TheGreatA?

I'm gonna refrain from the (even) bigger picture you're drawing aside from the outsized commerce connection - for now - but it has been hijacked and the internal war over it was settled about a decade ago with the ENDA debacle. I remember John Aravosis penning an article on Salon asking what the hell he has in common with a man who wants to cut off his penis, surgically construct a vagina, and live as a woman. He was eviscerated for it. These billionaire powerbrokers, lobby organizations and "activist" drones just recently raked Martina Navratilova over the coals for this shit.

What Gives The Trans Lobby The Right To Chastise Martina Navratilova?

They don't fucking have one, not ever.



Some of my views would probably be considered overtly "patriarchal" today and I do tend to view masculinity as a cornerstone of strong civilizations and cultures, which should be openly celebrated. As virtually the entire history of European art did, perpetually fixated on the idealized male image (better aesthetics). It's really the upending and deconstruction of masculinity more so than 'heteronormativity' because the two aren't always mutually inclusive. You may not believe that given a certain feminist infused and cultivated public image of a 'community' you think you know, but uh, subcultures and such.



Probably right on that though it wasn't intended as some kind of criticism bro, nor to imply you're thoughtless or cold and obviously not. Most of your content that I've seen is just fairly blunt and wastes no time in getting to the point. It's respectable. As an aside, I had no idea you were latino or a life long Democrat (wat?) until a few days ago.
Click to expand...

Lol, it's all good.

I didn't take it as a critique. Jus sayin'
 
Kafir-kun said:
Including them in the LGBTQ banner sends the wrong message, it should be talked about as a severe mental health issue more along the lines of schizophrenia. As long as a pedo hasn't actually committed an offense there's no reason why they shouldn't have rights and researching treatment could help in the long run.
Click to expand...

I quoted this post before you made it? Lol
 
Including them in the LGBTQ banner sends the wrong message, it should be talked about as a severe mental health issue more along the lines of schizophrenia. As long as a pedo hasn't actually committed an offense there's no reason why they shouldn't have rights and researching treatment could help in the long run.
 
MMAViewer said:
Well you can Google it yourself or I can post hundreds of these to prove you wrong.
But you would still stick your head in the sand on this and we both know it.
https://www.star-telegram.com/living/religion/article222576310.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...he-evangelical-church/?utm_term=.f995b5e6f228

https://www.christianitytoday.com/n...damentalist-baptist-church-abuse-scandal.html

Hell rip there is even a book about it!

https://www.amazon.com/Big-Book-Bad-Baptist-Preachers/dp/1518883664
Click to expand...

Actually the abuse is pretty much equall across the board including public schools. It’s worth the study but it really messes with conformation bias.
Here’s just one article.
And no, I’m not catholic.

https://www.investors.com/politics/...amp-down-news-of-children-abused-by-teachers/

Crisis As Millions Of Students Abused By Teachers
ibd-placeholder.png


  • 8/27/2014


Education: For a parent, the headline couldn't be more alarming: "Teacher of the Year accused of molesting student, charged with 5 felonies." It's a story that, tragically, is all too common — and all too underreported. Why?

We've all heard of the Catholic Church child abuse scandal that's still regularly covered, 20 to 40 years after much of the abuse took place. It too was tragic, and acknowledged as such by the church, which has taken action to prevent its ever happening again....

The same can't be said of unionized public education — where child abuse appears to be rampant, often with little done about it and with teachers unions largely silent. It gets little national media attention — certainly not on the scale that the church scandal did.

In the above-mentioned case, highlighted in an education news site this week, there might be a hint as to why: The teacher facing criminal charges for having sex with a student was a "union-selected 2014 North Dakota Teacher of the Year." He's on paid administrative leave.

We can't say this teacher is guilty. We can say, sadly, it's a story that's become distressingly familiar.

Yet virtually no sense of urgency is behind it.

A February 2012 Slate.com article asked: "How many kids are sexually abused by their teachers?" The alarming answer: "Probably millions." It's an epidemic.

If so, why the silence? For one, teachers unions don't want the truth to complicate contract talks and tarnish teachers' carefully cultivated image with the public. Administrators say it's almost impossible to fire a teacher.

For another, based on news coverage and opinion polls, the media believe public teachers are saints — and religion is bad. So while a church sex-abuse scandal gets covered, a school scandal gets covered up.

Toomey is pushing a bill — the Protecting Students from Sexual and Violent Predators Act — that would require states that get federal funds to do a background check on anyone who has access to childre
 
More pedo filth:

10-Year-Old Boy 'Drag Kid' Photographed With Naked Adult Drag Queen

On Monday, 10-year-old Canadian boy Nemis Quinn Mélançon-Golden was featured in a troubling Huck Magazine piece highlighting the life of a so-called "child drag queen."

Young Nemis, whose drag name is "Queen Lactacia," was shot by photographer Jonathan Frederick Turton for the spread. In one of the shots that did not make the magazine, Nemis, in full drag makeup and a black dress, is posing for a photo with the Season 7 winner of "RuPaul's Drag Race," Violet Chachki. In the shocking photo, Violet is wearing nothing but a pair of heels and a small piece of fabric covering his genitals

child_drag_queen.jpg


:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Devout Pessimist said:
More pedo filth:

10-Year-Old Boy 'Drag Kid' Photographed With Naked Adult Drag Queen

On Monday, 10-year-old Canadian boy Nemis Quinn Mélançon-Golden was featured in a troubling Huck Magazine piece highlighting the life of a so-called "child drag queen."

Young Nemis, whose drag name is "Queen Lactacia," was shot by photographer Jonathan Frederick Turton for the spread. In one of the shots that did not make the magazine, Nemis, in full drag makeup and a black dress, is posing for a photo with the Season 7 winner of "RuPaul's Drag Race," Violet Chachki. In the shocking photo, Violet is wearing nothing but a pair of heels and a small piece of fabric covering his genitals

child_drag_queen.jpg


:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
Click to expand...

There was a thread on this that got dumped in pretty short order for reasons unknown.

https://forums.sherdog.com/threads/...ographed-with-naked-adult-drag-queen.3894601/
 
It's not even a little boy dressed as a girl, it's a little boy dressed like prostitute/stripper/pornstar, in a way that adult women dress in order to be sexually provocative. In one of those pictures he is wearing fishnet stockings and sitting with his legs open ffs. And yes, it would also be totally inappropriate for a little girl to be doing that. But to top it all off and as if all that wasn't sick enough, they then have him pose for a photo with a naked drag queen. Unreal where this degeneracy is heading.
 
Kafir-kun said:
Including them in the LGBTQ banner sends the wrong message, it should be talked about as a severe mental health issue more along the lines of schizophrenia.
Click to expand...

We should not be taking any steps to humanize pedophiles in any way. That's some dangerous ground to be treading. If we ever get to a point where pedophiles are comfortable in admitting their desires, we've gone down the wrong path. I don't buy the argument that it will stop any abuse, unless of course the "treatment" is chemical castration.
 
HereticBD said:
We should not be taking any steps to humanize pedophiles in any way. That's some dangerous ground to be treading. If we ever get to a point where pedophiles are comfortable in admitting their desires, we've gone down the wrong path. I don't buy the argument that it will stop any abuse, unless of course the "treatment" is chemical castration.
Click to expand...
Even then. There is no certainty.
 
tonni said:
Even then. There is no certainty.
Click to expand...

True. Some are just power tripping, with little in the way of sexual gratification. Still though, I think if there was any "treatment" to be offered, it would be eliminating their sexual desires as best we can, and not trying to "understand" them. If we must, we got plenty of pedo's we can psychoanalyze in prison. They should never be made to feel comfortable disclosing such desires(unless it's a trap). These are humans I have absolutely no problem declaring as "undesirables", who are not fit to live in society.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,980
Messages
55,459,140
Members
174,787
Latest member
Freddie556

Share this page

Back
Top