- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 758
- Reaction score
- 0
I really hope you don't mean as a headliner.
I really hope you don't mean as a headliner.
He unified his belt once, does that count? Of course it should, because the night he won that interim belt it would have been the actual belt. meaning he'd have the same amount of defenses as Dos Anjos.
What a strange way to detract from conor, you already know Dos Anjos fought pettis in march and didn't defend until the end of December. Where as Conor fought 3 times that year in 2 title affairs.
but cling on to your little technicallity, because really it's all you have in what ever pathetic excuse for an argument you're trying to make.
You went full retard.
First of all, Aldo was not an an inactive champion. They added that interim championship for keeping the attractiveness of that card intact. That belt thing was unnecessary. before UFC 189 last time Aldo defended his belt was 9 months ago. You can't strip any champion for 9 months of inactivity. Besides Belt unification does not fall into the category of title defense. So no, He hasn't defended his belt yet.
Second of all,
Conor has a 7 years old(2008-15) MMA career. In between these years Conor has fought 21 times, avging 3 fights per year.
RDA has a 11 years old ( 2004-15) MMA Career. In between these years RDA fought 32 times. aving 2.909 or approx 3 fights per year. literally same.
Third of all
Conor started to fight in UFC from 2013 & From 2013(april) he has 7 fights in UFC. in the same timespan RDA fought 8 times( first fight in 2013 in August). So how can claim such an absurd thing like Conor is more active than RDA?
Besides, RDA came to Pettis fight injured with a torn ACL. he was recovering from that injury. That's why he took some time off for recovering from that injury.
the reality is, they are both relatively active champions. it can be highlighted by the fact that in the last 3 title fights the promotion has put on, both have been involved. so really, it's a hair splitting argument that proves nothing.
lmao you didn't even read my whole post did you? I basically said all of those things. to compare 1 title defense to 0 (which would be 1, if not for circumstances not involving conor), just to prove a point in an argument is pretty retarded. you know this. You're going with hard facts and that's nice, but remember to provide context.
Don't have the balls?? He is literally a lightweight fighter & his original intention was to fight in the Lightweight division. It's UFC who forced him to fight in Featherweight division. By fighting in FW, he was just making some extreme cuts. That's all.most champs dont have the balls of conor so no it wont happen. fighting a heaver champ > defending the belt.
To answer, your question, 1 time or 0 times, depending on whether or not you consider the Aldo fight a defense. In any case, not many times.How many times has Conor defended his belt?