- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 35,945
- Reaction score
- 4,933
He meant the poster named Atheist.
Ah ok okay sorry @KONG-D'SNT-TAP I am having a bad day today as some Muaslims are persecuting me on another forum.
He meant the poster named Atheist.
I took it a very different way. I took it as saying 2nd ammendment folk won't let their guns be taken irregardless of what some judge says. By all means though... paint the picture that trump is calling for political assasinations.
This must be the trump pivot we've been hearing so much about
If i was talking about gun owners taking up action against the president I'd want to be very clear considering I was running for president. But hey I'm not an adviser for trump.
Lol says the coward who didn't even have the balls to tag me.
What a wimp.
Ah ok okay sorry @KONG-D'SNT-TAP I am having a bad day today as some Muaslims are persecuting me on another forum.
So you didn't actually listen to him? He was talking about a scenario where votes are already counted. Cute try though.
If the quote in @InvestigatorIL 's sig is accurate, I'm not sure why anyone even takes time to reply to TCK. TCK is Trump of this sub-forum. Saying nonsense and not knowing what's going on.
No I think he is saying he doesn't know if the 2nd Ammendment folk can do something if she gets her way with the judges.Dude I get what you're trying to do, but step back, throw a line in the loss column and move on to a new thread.
He's calling on gun owners to take action in the event that Hilary has picked judges who are anti-gun. He's suggesting action at a time when the only action would then be violence.
I'm not retarded so I can see that as clearly as you do. But I'm not playing red vs blue, so I'm not gonna chase your tail with you.
Good luck being selectively stupid.
His statement is in the context of Hilary as president picking her judges. He's not calling for political action to prevent her, he's suggesting violence towards her if the political action doesn't go his way.
Fer fucks sake folks, even republicans should be embarrassed.
You lack observation. I stated that I *only* *read* what was posted in here. So no sh*t I didn't *watch* the youtube video linked in the thread.
No I think he is saying he doesn't know if the 2nd Ammendment folk can do something if she gets her way with the judges.
That's the way I read it. He's so choppy with the way he speaks.
I'd imagine if he wanted Hillary dead he suggest doing it prior to election?
Yea, he told people to shoot her in the face. Those exact words. Exact. Words.His statement is in the context of Hilary as president picking her judges. He's not calling for political action to prevent her, he's suggesting violence towards her if the political action doesn't go his way.
Fer fucks sake folks, even republicans should be embarrassed.
Wait wait.... I'm at work so I've only read the quote. Was he specifically talking about guns prior? Or was it super generalized as in she's just picking judges we don't like.
If it was already in the context of guns then his comment was a not a call to violence but rather a call to protect gun rights. If it was in general to receiving unfavorable judges, then it's pretty tasteless
Yea, he told people to shoot her in the face. Those exact words. Exact. Words.