"You just lacks intelligence." I love it. In a post that includes a misspelling, a sentence fragment and number disagreement. Still, some points to respond to: History is not always written from the perspective of those writing it; the modern, academic discipline of history is largely about using material evidence and primary sources to deconstruct unconscious narratives and provide multidimensional understandings of historical events and trends. That's why low brows (probably like yourself) despise it; it shines light on unconsciously held ideologies and biases. So you howl about how the academy is infiltrated by liberals, because God-forbid someone point out the limitations of our long-held beliefs. Just think of how stupid that attitude would be in the hard sciences: Oh, no, you can't use new evidence to reach new understandings and challenge traditional paradigms... that would be.... progressive hipster bullshit! In sum: Eat my shorts.