- Joined
- Jun 9, 2014
- Messages
- 11,508
- Reaction score
- 3
He folds every time he gets stunned. Meanwhile, Conor usually stuns his opponents.
It was just a bullshit setup all together.
It was just a bullshit setup all together.
Don't even think you can label Cerrone a gatekeeper anymore. He's more like a level 1 random encounter that has no bearing on the adventure.Donald in the loss won the Gatekeeper belt! GK belt!
He deserves the "Choker" belt. CM saw that cerrone is lazy in the clinch early in fights. See the Perry fight. Exactly the same."People say I lose big fights. Watch me!" *loses another big fight*
Choker
It's both. He's a notorious choker , but he was never gonna beat Conor either way. IMO
Doesn’t really correlate, different fighters. Connor is a great striker but he has shown little heart.just remember that it took Tony two rounds and he was getting tagged and Conor annihilated him in 40 seconds.
Yeah because journeymen Nate Diaz and ceroone are bigger challenges that defending a title against a legit contenderDefending Belt is for ordinary Champs but Conor loves to push himself and always go for more bigger challanges. Thats why he is the most popular with most fans and makes by far the most money
I personally think it's a bit of both. He's probably a couple paces off championship level, but if he was the type who could show up on game day more consistently he might have won a title. I always refer to Forest Griffin. He had clear limitations but used what he bad well.Disagree with chuck I think he is just not championship level.