- Joined
- Jul 2, 2020
- Messages
- 8,272
- Reaction score
- 12,711
licensing seems like a tall, hard to enforce, bureaucratic order, and for me, nothing needs to be done - this is just moral panicMaybe I dunno. I think a big part of the problem is more the people that own pits. There are a lot of shitty dog owners that get pits for the image and don’t really care about owning a dog really. A lot of breeds are aggressive if raised by shitty owners.
Maybe a licensing program is in order. I’ve met some really great and friendly pits that I can’t imagine being bad dogs. I blame the humans on this one
But if we do have to draw up some legislation, I think making owners take out insurance would be the most sensible option but again, you're placing financial burden on millions because a few times a year someone gets mauled by them?
Pitbulls are misunderstood probably because, like the gun issue, the people pushing for legislation don't own them and don't interact with people that do own them. People are demanding solutions to issues they never face and never know about.
And make no mistake, I'm not your average pitbull apologist - I do consider them a dangerous dog breed due to their power and unwillingness to stop fighting when in action ("gameness") but they aren't unpredictable dogs that decide to snap for no reason.