Does Ronda Rousey really deserve the ESPY best fighter award?

901px-Gennady_Golovkin.jpg
 
Mayweather won the biggest fight of the decade

Ronda fought C level fighters
 
What the fu? Do you know who did Floyd fight? Was Manny a can? He was almost just as good and had more power. The level of competition is men's sports is much higher.

And he stilled hasn't knocked out any one of them in years and years.

"whaaaa, because the comps tougher!" Mayweather fans are sad sad people. Ronda is dominating her division with spectacular finishes. Floyd is ducking guys til they're past their prime and then hugging them for twelve rounds.
 
And he stilled hasn't knocked out any one of them in years and years.

"whaaaa, because the comps tougher!" Mayweather fans are sad sad people. Ronda is dominating her division with spectacular finishes. Floyd is ducking guys til they're past their prime and then hugging them for twelve rounds.

you trolls just get easier and easier to spot

you're supposed to play dumb not delusional
 
Mayweather won the biggest fight of the decade

Ronda fought C level fighters

You mean Floyd won the biggest fight of the LAST decade, because back then it would have been the fight to see who the greatest boxer of our generation was. Since he put it off for 6 years, it became less meaningful.
 
you trolls just get easier and easier to spot

you're supposed to play dumb not delusional

Haha, Floyd is a boring point fighter and you love him. Good for you man, even the most boring fighters need fans.
 
Haha, Floyd is a boring point fighter and you love him. Good for you man, even the most boring fighters need fans.

i couldn't give half a fuck about Floyd but i can recognize his talent

being a point fighter doesn't make him less skilled than a finisher it just means he has a different style
 
Haha, Floyd is a boring point fighter and you love him. Good for you man, even the most boring fighters need fans.

Dude the category was for Best Fighter,you really think Ronda's skill level is higher than Floyd's?

Ronda's not even the best fighter in the ufc.
 
Dude the category was for Best Fighter,you really think Ronda's skill level is higher than Floyd's?

Ronda's not even the best fighter in the ufc.

Floyd hasn't finished a guy in how long? If he's so great, he'd be taking care of business. Say what you will, but Ronda dominates the best females in her sport and is leagues above her competition. Floyd cherry picks guys and then point fights them. Floyd may be the best sports competitor in combat sports, but best fighter? Get out.
 
It's really a debate on whether doing better then reasonably imaginable in two fights against fighters who likely don't rank in the top 500 MMAist vs Floyd beating Maidana and Pacman where Manny was considered the #2 P4P MMAist.

Based on the level of competition, JBJ should be far, far ahead of Ronda.

If the award is solely based on performance without context then Ronda is the easy winner, looking only at context Floyd wins this by a mile. Combining context and performance and you can make a case for either.

What I feel more strongly about is Ronda winning best female athlete over Serena. When Senera won 3 (or 4, not sure when the voting period was) grand slam titles in a row and is competing so often and against such a deep talent pool that it's really hard to say that any athlete is better then her.
 
Floyd hasn't finished a guy in how long? If he's so great, he'd be taking care of business. Say what you will, but Ronda dominates the best females in her sport and is leagues above her competition. Floyd cherry picks guys and then point fights them. Floyd may be the best sports competitor in combat sports, but best fighter? Get out.

Dude what you're talking about is entertainment and dominance.Sure Ronda may be more entertaining(in your eyes) and have more dominant performances overall.But that doesn't mean she is the best/most skilled fighter in the world,far from it actually.

If the award was for most dominant/entertaining fighter id have to pick GGG over Ronda anyway.
 
Last edited:
It's really a debate on whether doing better then reasonably imaginable in two fights against fighters who likely don't rank in the top 500 MMAist vs Floyd beating Maidana and Pacman where Manny was considered the #2 P4P MMAist.

Based on the level of competition, JBJ should be far, far ahead of Ronda.

If the award is solely based on performance without context then Ronda is the easy winner, looking only at context Floyd wins this by a mile. Combining context and performance and you can make a case for either.

What I feel more strongly about is Ronda winning best female athlete over Serena. When Senera won 3 (or 4, not sure when the voting period was) grand slam titles in a row and is competing so often and against such a deep talent pool that it's really hard to say that any athlete is better then her.

You have valid points but you also forget context about Floyd. Mayweather's current stock in media is pretty much shit because of domestic violence issues.

More context about Ronda aswell: When comparing her to Serena, the difference really is about mainstream media perception to the athlete. Ronda is championing this strong female - feminist shit, talking shit about owning Mayweather and that just tickles the boxes of many people outside the general ESPY-audience.
 
Dude what you're talking about is entertainment and dominance.Sure Ronda may be more entertaining(in your eyes) and have more dominant performances overall.But that doesn't mean she is the best/most skilled fighter in the world,far from it actually.

If the award was for most dominant/entertaining fighter id have to pick GGG over Ronda anyway.

Floyd isn't a fighter. He's a sportsman. He has little to no killer instinct. Plus he's pretty much a total POS. His fans can cry all they want, but he's a point scorer. He might as well play tennis.
 
Floyd isn't a fighter. He's a sportsman. He has little to no killer instinct. Plus he's pretty much a total POS. His fans can cry all they want, but he's a point scorer. He might as well play tennis.


Im not even a floyd fan dude.Im just a guy struggling to understand how someone could watch a Floyd fight and a Ronda fight and then somehow come to the conclusion that Ronda is the more skilled fighter between the two.

Knockout/finish percentages don't mean shit in terms of ability and skill.Boxing HW champ Deontay Wilder has like a 97% knockout rate(out of 35 pro fights)going by your rationale Deontay must be a better fighter than Mohammed Ali LOL.
 
Well I voted for her, so I'll own it and say "yes", she is the best fighter. And boxing is barely fighting in the first place. Get mad all you want, but it's the truth
 
Cat Zingano>Manny Pacquiao. She was undefeated when Ronda fought her.

Also, who gives a shit about winning an espy? That's like winning an mtv award.
 
wont ever respect floyd he waited till manny was past his prime and after he got knocked the fuck out before he fought him

manny/floyd was suppose to happen in 2009 when manny was 29/30

this is why no one puts floyd in the top 5,10,20,or even 50 best boxers of all time
 
Awards, recognitions, honours in society in the vast majority of circumstances is meaningless.

They are affected by political and monetary factors.
 
this is why no one puts floyd in the top 5,10,20,or even 50 best boxers of all time

WTF???
You don't know what you're talking about dude. Who are all these people you are referring to?
 
Back
Top