Does it really count as ducking if...

You're lobbying for a fight against an all- time great?

No.

The answer is no.

http://mmajunkie.com/2016/08/champ-...az-to-georges-st-pierre-preferably-at-ufc-205

 

There all cowards lol.

 

Defend against the top contenders first. Then take fights to feed your ego.

 

I don't know and I don't care. They should be defending it against top ranked fighters.

 

I hope they make this fight

 

Bisping is ducking Jacare.

 

At least learn to use the correct spelling of "they're" if you're going to shitpost.

 

That's not what they're talking about.

 

Even if you risk making no money in your short time on top?

 

Yes the answer is yes

 

EVERYONE WHO FIGHTS PROFESSIONALLY FOR A LIVING BUT ISNT SOMEONE I LIKE IS A COWARD

 

Yeah, I agree. "Ducking" implies being scared. That's not the case with Woodley. He still should fight Wonderboy before anyone else though.

 

I don't blame the fighters for trying to take money fights instead of actually defending against the people who deserve the title shot. I blame the UFC for acquiescing.

 

I disagree with that. That's not smart. These guys should score the biggest pay days they can first and then worry about some other guy who "deserves it".

 

See the post directly above yours.

 

If that all time great hasn't fought in 3 years then yes. The answer is yes. Wonderboy has recent wins over Hendricks & Rory. If tyron isn't going to fight him then he should vacate the title then fight who he wants.

 

Yes just like Conor did. His first defence was against... ?...?

 

He won't have a first defense.

 

I don't by any means think Woodley is going to rein for decades as the champ, but you guys have to realize that Wonderboy is very beatable. The first person to actually get him down wins. And I do think Woodley can get him down. Wonder boy is just the Machida era all over again.

 

Obviously not. Sad that you have to walk people through such basic logic.