He totally tried to avoid those questions. As an MMA fan you automatically score the fight all the time, you don't just watch it as if it's a movie.
I can believe... i don't score every single fight myself, sometimes i just sit and enjoy.. and if it becomes a close contest i end up re-watching and scoring it in my head.
Except...you know...he DID, after the fight presser, claiming that the fight proved Jones was just coasting on height and reach. He basically called his champ a fraud. That's not the comment of someone trying to coddle his champ and inoculate him from a score.
I can believe... i don't score every single fight myself, sometimes i just sit and enjoy.. and if it becomes a close contest i end up re-watching and scoring it in my head.
Um....didn't Dana throw Jones under the bus and claim this fight proved Jones only won by size and reach before? That isn't the comment of someone who is trying to shield a fighter via conspiracy.
Sad thing is that it also devalues Gustafsson since he's the next biggest guy at LHW. He basically said that their skill, heart, and determination has won their fights, their size and reach did. Either way, Dana has never made it a secret that he REALLY doesn't like Jones and wants him out since he was the only one who actually had the power and leeway to play hard ball with him and actually do it.
If you saw the press conference you really could see how Dana had to stop himself for a minute and really consider his reply before responding. It was not an instant reply which would look like something honest he throws out there.
Dana was surprised to have an exciting 5 round title fight in Canada. Usually the ones that go 5 rounds are not very exciting. So, he was a bit distracted.
I think that's a misconception. Dana was simply saying that that was the main reason why Gus did better than Jones' previous challengers. Not the same thing at all.Um....didn't Dana throw Jones under the bus and claim this fight proved Jones only won by size and reach before? That isn't the comment of someone who is trying to shield a fighter via conspiracy.
I'm not sure, but you know what?
I'm not sure I think the president of the UFC should voice an opinion as to who won after a close fight like this. If it's a robbery, sure react, but when it could have gone either way better to stay neutral. He honestly played it well by talking up both guys, and they both deserved it.
Interesting. I plan on watching it later.
Dana's scores tend to lean towards puncher/boxers. It seems to me he's shown a bias in that regard so him scoring the fight for Gus makes sense.
I don't get why people care so much what Dana White thinks of fights. His opinion of who won the fight is honestly worthless. It doesn't affect anything
THIS HAS TO BE THE MOST RETARDED THING EVER.
The guy who runs the whole ship. Guy who publicly makes your image look better or worse. Guy who has a say in who stats/who goes, who gets title shots, who gets more publicity (e.g when dana talks about a fighter alot it makes people talk about them making them more valuable as a commodity hence richer). What dana thinks goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooes a looooong way in this sport.
Source? I call bullshit. Dana has never shown bias to any style of fighter. If anything he's shown bias towards more marketable fighters.