1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Does a fighters union effect the USADA testing / penalties?

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by aragona, Aug 11, 2016.

  1. aragona Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    I'm sure with a collective bargaining contract through unionization there will be language in the contract which will change how tests are administered, when they are given and what the penalties are for positive tests. Unions are about protecting their members, and the state athletic commissions will also have to follow the languages in a collective bargaining agreement.

    USADA will probably not be able to track every movement of a fighter and track them down for a test as it'll be considered invasive to the fighters personal life. On the flip side I'm sure there won't be a situation as we saw with Brock with the test coming back after the fight and the contract would probably protect the competitor of a fighter (Hunt) who tested positive (Brock).

    Though I don't think we'll see a fighters union as WME has serious money and has government connections as Ari Emanel's brother Rham is a former White House Chief of Staff and current mayor of Chicago.

    It's interesting to think about.
     
  2. jayo2k Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    MONTREAL
    Busting Overeem and Vitor is needed for the sport, we need to catch the cheater... Now the testing is more accurate and catch fighters off guard... Everybody favorite fighter is exposed forbeing a cheat... now testing cheater is not good for the sport...
     
  3. gimp0 Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    4,978
    Likes Received:
    0
    I imagine it would. I think it effects everything, wouldn't it? I don't really know how unions or associations work when it comes to sports.
     
  4. Paradigm Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    18,161
    Likes Received:
    29
    Location:
    LA
    It's fine people who stream fights but not for fans who book flights, hotels and tickets...only to have a WMMA fight as the main event instead of JBJ vs Cormier.
     
  5. aragona Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    Agreed....but the question is how does a fighters union, if implemented, effect testing processes and penalties?
     
  6. MMA Silver Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,564
    Likes Received:
    6
    Of course a fighter's union would try to undermine drug testing. Not only are most athletes worried about USADA, but they don't like the inconveniences integral to proper testing.
     
  7. aragona Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    I hear you but....If you book plane, hotel and purchase a ticket to a World Series game and it happens to get rained out do you blame mother nature?

    Not trying to be a smart ass, but that's the risk you take. There are no guarantees....check the ticket, I'm sure it says promotion is not responsible for changes.
     
  8. AP_RESURRECTION Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    24,701
    Likes Received:
    23
    sorry to say, but thats your bad - cards are subject to change and there have been a ton of last minute changes - if you book a flight and buy a ticket, you should understand that the card could change and potentially suck and you're taking that risk - you shoul d just be happy to go on vacatoin and enjoy - if you're dead set on watching a certain fight and its cancellation will ruin your trip, then its your bad for planning it in the first place

    you need to be careful how you spend money w the ufc, otherwise its no ones fault but your own - not trying to be a dck, but just reality - its your bad for getting suckered into doing all that expecting a certain fight to go down
     
  9. Mondo Freaks Green Gucci Suit Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2013
    Messages:
    26,677
    Likes Received:
    264
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    The union members have to agree on their agenda first before negotiating with the UFC. If they decide that they want USDASA violations to be just a slap on the wrist, they can ask for that. But within the group itself, you have fighters who do not use and have never used and who would want stricter penalties. On the other hand, you have fighters who have no problem using and do want the slap on the wrist approach to discipline. So yes, a union will definitely have an effect on USADA testing.

    I think it was the MLB players union that pushed for marijuana not being penalized. It could work in MMA but its kinda sketchy to advocate for lesser PEDs tests and reduced penalties.
     
  10. papasmurf999 Green Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    0
    Much like wrestling I'm sure it says card subject to change. Sometimes they adverstise someone and they don't show up. Its just a b.s. way for the promotion to cover it's ass I'm case things get changed last second. Which they did in the case of jbj and Cormier.
     
  11. cheezum Location: Wasteland

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    0
    if the union goes after USADA they lose all credibility and public support.
     
  12. aragona Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    Who loses credibility and public support, USADA?

    Remember they came in late with Brock's test results....so their credibility could be questioned. I'm not saying I question their credibility and I agree they are cleaning up the sport, but at the same time it's not a matter of the union "going after" USADA, it's the language in a union contract protecting a fighter from errors by USADA. Also, the matter of fighters "checking in" daily on where the are so USADA can administer a test if their name is drawn. Sorry but don't bother me when on my honeymoon in Fiji.
     
  13. cheezum Location: Wasteland

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2015
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    0
    the union loses credibility. the union should be looking for better pay, healthcare, policies, etc etc. no clean fighter should have a problem with USADA. you get tested a few times a year, takes a half hour maybe. a union of athletes in a sport rampant with PEDS campaigning to relax testing regimes doesn't make fighters look good.
     
  14. jayo2k Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,918
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    MONTREAL
    Then it is to the UFC to reimburse the fans, I mean according to the law, when you purchase something, you actually sign a contract to pay for a said service... If the other party fail to deliver the service, they have to reimburse the buyer... Fans paid for Jones-Cormier, UFC did not deliver, if the fans sue the UFC, this organisation is in a world of trouble...
    They need to be tougher on the cheater, like banned for life and give their purse to the other fighter (in case of a lesnar-hunt), by being tough, few will risk cheating believe me
     
  15. aragona Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York
    Valid point....but remember unions are a business and for as much as they want you to believe they are looking out for their "brother" members, they make deals behind the curtain with the business owners and the money is top of mind. Believe me, they could care less about credibility.
     
  16. csroster Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    13,411
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Harrisburg, PA
    Honestly I'm no expert on the details, but I feel in general a group is more powerful than several individuals. Some things may be banned that from a fighters perspective aren't viewed as legitimate.
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2016
  17. dim_ Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2014
    Messages:
    25,467
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Tyneside-Lancashire-Devon
    Doesnt matter... Nevada athletic commission penaltie are now the same as USADA penalties (actually in some cases harsher)

    So even if the UFC left USADA completely, they would still get 2 year bans from Nevada :D



    Besides, if fighters turn around and say "we dont want drug testing" how does that make them look...

    Do you really think all the fighters are anti-usada? Fans might be, media might be, the fighters that caught certainly are, but you really think all the fighters are against it? Not a chance.
     
  18. capnlarge Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2007
    Messages:
    13,450
    Likes Received:
    232
    I actually really hope this union happens. It's the first domino in a long line of important changes that ends with Athletic Commissions being obsolete.
     
  19. dim_ Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2014
    Messages:
    25,467
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    Tyneside-Lancashire-Devon
    No.. they didnt..

    The turnaround on Brocks samples was normal, if anything it was actually pretty quick.
     
  20. suffersystem Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2011
    Messages:
    4,312
    Likes Received:
    45
    Location:
    Prince Edward Island, Canada
    That's why it even says when you buy the ticket, cards are subject to change.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.