- Joined
- Jul 29, 2016
- Messages
- 82
- Reaction score
- 0
Asking for a friend.
Asking for a friend.
This and all the ''Was tyson too short for todays boxers'' comments and threads...
Do you feel like a manlet?
Do you feel like you are resorted to bangin because of your insufficient height?
We can help. manlet jog warm ups start 730AM
serious answer: Height has very little to do with skill imo. create a style that works around physical weaknesses and makes then advantages ala Tyson
#manletbrotherhood
#shortsupremacy
#platinummidgets
#shortbangers
Since there are none, doesn't that answer you question? We are midgets compared to Joshua and the rest of the gang. And since reach correlates with height, there is even an extra disadvantage.
Joshua is 6'6, 6'2 is ''only'' 4 inches difference. Tyson fought guys 6'4-6'7 easily he was only 5'11 thats like a 5-8 inch difference. Id agree with kicks height would make more of a problem but i dont think saying being short (tyson) or tall (struve) is in its own an advantage or disadvantage. depends how you go about using it
Joshua is 6'6, 6'2 is ''only'' 4 inches difference.
It's the same disadvantage in boxing.
Mike Tyson is not a fighter of today and he was even a statistical outlier back then.
a more skilled 6'2 boxer will beat a 6'6 guy. just saying height on its own means very little
A much lesser skilled 6'6 guy can definately beat a 6'2 guy as well. All he needs is a good jab and half the work is done. The skill margin is too low if both are equally matched, for the shorter guy to win by just being better. It needs to be a substantial difference.
wow wow "#platinummidgets" watch your mouth bro i dont pay for shit...im of the jewish religion surprisingly but platinum i aint and i take pride in it hombre