- Joined
- Oct 11, 2006
- Messages
- 5,206
- Reaction score
- 2,326
Which one are you anticipating more?
My next ban
Or your hormone injections to become a man.
Which one are you anticipating more?
My next ban
Or your hormone injections to become a man.
I don't think anyone has an issue with that though. There's just a lot of philosophical space between potential human life, and human life with all the same rights and autonomy as the mother. If there wasn't, we'd have an issue with extra fertilised eggs in the ivf clinic. Those are potential human lives.
I will take that as the injections.
As somebody who cares about the environment, I say we take this brilliant line of reasoning to its logical conclusion by defining concepts out of existence.Now take "person" or "human".... when is it? Cluster of cells. When there's a pupil? What about fingers? Is that a human? What about neural firing in the brain stem? Is that a human? And even when you finish that thought experiment.... When is a human a "person"?
Sperm is a live organism. That is why
This is where we get into the reverse of Theseus' boat.
When is a bridge a bridge? The collection of wood and rope on opposing banks of the river? The transition from wood to planks and tied via rope with foundation on either side? Is that now a bridge? A protruding set of planks from foundation that has yet to be connected? Is that a bridge? When is it a bridge? What condition does it have to be in to be considered a bridge?
Now take "person" or "human".... when is it? Cluster of cells. When there's a pupil? What about fingers? Is that a human? What about neural firing in the brain stem? Is that a human? And even when you finish that thought experiment.... When is a human a "person"?
But nah, let's just go "omg procedures are gross. ew. libs probably eat them"
This is where we get into the reverse of Theseus' boat.
When is a bridge a bridge? The collection of wood and rope on opposing banks of the river? The transition from wood to planks and tied via rope with foundation on either side? Is that now a bridge? A protruding set of planks from foundation that has yet to be connected? Is that a bridge? When is it a bridge? What condition does it have to be in to be considered a bridge?
Now take "person" or "human".... when is it? Cluster of cells. When there's a pupil? What about fingers? Is that a human? What about neural firing in the brain stem? Is that a human? And even when you finish that thought experiment.... When is a human a "person"?
I can't believe this video is still giving conservatives the feeling they're about to win an argument. If you weren't so disconnected from the thing you fight again, you'd already know about this. The speech is an emotion play because the fetus is already non-viable during these actions.
None of what he talks about negates the fact it should be legal and safe.
Just because this dude decided to become an evangelical, doesn't do anything for the argument.
So you define life and what is worth protecting by 'life span'?
So a life with short life span is worth less? Am I reading that correctly?
Some religious folks believe life begins with the sperm and ova meaning they are looking at the 'potential' of what this can grow or form into before many would consider it a viable entity or person. That is the discussion that is also happening in womb once sperm and egg are introduced. At what point is it wrong to interfere? Is the morning after pill wrong because it may prevent sperm and egg from meeting or force a newly fertilized egg to shed? Is the moment after the egg is fertilized a 'human' or does that happen after once a brain, heart and other things are present. The 'every sperm is sacred' joke in Monty Python about the Catholics is true too many. So it is important when discussing this issue to see where each person draws their own line so we have that frame of reference.A sperm is in no way a human being so my response here is I don't now why it's even being brought up in the discussion.
Dude live your own damn life and let other people do whatever they want with their body.
I feel sorry for people who constantly want to push their own morals and belief system onto others. You can fuck right off with your sense of higher moral ground.
With that said: I wouldn't want my partner to go through an abortion.
A fetus is not their body. Did you watch the video? You really don't think there is something wrong with him cutting up and pulling out body parts like that?
Oh morals is the problem. We should just do away with our laws because who are we to say what is moral right? Murder, theft, rape, incest should all be legal.
Do you eat animals?
Do you eat animals?
I'm pro-choice
There's a difference between a one month fetus and and a 6 month baby.
A sperm is in no way a human being so my response here is I don't now why it's even being brought up in the discussion.