- Joined
- Apr 11, 2017
- Messages
- 8,670
- Reaction score
- 532
I have read it from different sources, are you sure?He wasn't Raja champ. And even if he was, it doesn't mean anything. Malaipet wasn't a good fighter.
That always seems to be a credible one in regards to MT/K1.
How so? Elaborate please. Considering both stadiums have their ranking system that doesn't make any sense for me.People like you just make lazy reference to these title without knowing what they mean. Being a stadium champion does not make you a great fighter, by default.
Also, in regards to your previous post. As i said to Coca, the difference with KB/Karate/boxing is that fighters with these backgrounds have been very successful in MMA. No Thai has been successful in MMA.
In my opinion it's about the style, it just doesn't translate well enough into MMA, and i have heard legit FMT competitors say the same, that the stance/rhythm doesn't fit them in MMA. To Thai elitists the reason is just that "Thais never cared enough to try", total BS.