- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 43,744
- Reaction score
- 2,835
Oh, it's definitely very hard to go against the 'what's best for the children' argument, non biological parents have been forced to pay child support under that premise. It just so happen that what's best for them is also best for the custodial parent. Funny how you said 'money that could go to diapers and school supplies'. Because child support money don't go to the children, it goes to the spouse. All you can do is prey that they uses you money on your children the way you would like to and not themselves. It's also 'what's best for the children' that visitation rights are enforced yet it rarely ever is. Withhold payment though and see what happens.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but I'm sharing how I see things.
I 100% agree with you. It's extremely easy to take advantage of child support. I will concede that women have the advantage because I do truly think it's easier for them to argue for custody (even if both work similar schedules) thus enabling them to get child support.
I'm just against a lot of the ignorance and faulty logic on here in regards to divorce. The other issue that is laughable that comes up is people whining about the amount of $ that goes to child support. You can have someone who makes $500k w/ a big child support payment, and people say, "this is so unfair!! a child doesn't need that much to live". It's as if all child support payments should be equal regardless of income. The idea is that the child, viewed as an innocent victim in the divorce, can maintain the lifestyle prior to the divorce. There is no reason someone who makes $500k should be paying the same as someone who makes $50k.