Anytime there is a robbery it is bad.
Just because someone benefits from a robbery doesn't mean I want them to lose a fight later that they should have won. That makes zero sense.
For example Cowboy just got a gift decision tonight. I would be equally as pissed if Cowboy went out and got robbed in his next fight by judges and was given a loss when he should have won. I wouldn't say "Serves him right for getting a gift against Bendo"
Strange, I thought the only round he clearly won was 2.
Odd how close fights can produce such different interpretations.
Needs instant rematch.
What? No. I think we've had enough of Benson spamming that side kick to the knee for the next year or so.
Anytime there is a robbery it is bad.
Just because someone benefits from a robbery doesn't mean I want them to lose a fight later that they should have won. That makes zero sense.
For example Cowboy just got a gift decision tonight. I would be equally as pissed if Cowboy went out and got robbed in his next fight by judges and was given a loss when he should have won. I wouldn't say "Serves him right for getting a gift against Bendo"
Except this wasn't a close decision though.
Bendo clearly won rounds 1 and 3.
People should care that the judges are getting it wrong.