Do Muay Thai fans have a similar distaste for excecssive clinching as Boxing fans do?

VicariousVice

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
3,316
Reaction score
1
First of all, I'll state that I like a moderate amount of clinch. If you look at my avatar in which I've chosen and if you have commented on another one of my earlier posts I've stated that I very much love too see knee strikes(it's one of my main reasons I enjoy watching Muay Thai/European and Japanese Kickboxing). But the problem I've encountered with watching Muay Thai is that ,too a certain degree, I find myself not enjoying excessive clinching like I do everything else. Boxing fans experience a similar problem which I'm sure you're all aware of with the HW champ Wladimir Klitchko(whom they've dubbed Grabimir Klintchko because of this). Glory's Cor Hemmers addresses this in their blog about the use of the 3 second clinch, which leaves time too initiate a successful clinch game without interfering too much with the overall entertainment of the fight. I love technical stand-up fights, but the real problem I have with excessive clinching in MT is that it's harder too witness the impact/effect/power/technique of the knees thrown from the clinch, but maybe it's just my untrained eye?

In fear of making myself look very stupid by posting this I also I ask, do you like excessive clinching in Muay Thai? Or would you rather see strikes thrown from a distance(considering they possess more power/are more noticeable/pleasing too the eye?).
 
Isn't clinching one of the main tenants of Muay Thai? I mean I don't really practice Muay Thai but I was under the impression that was one of their main skillsets. And one of the main focuses of the training of Thai boxers.
 
Isn't clinching one of the main tenants of Muay Thai? I mean I don't really practice Muay Thai but I was under the impression that was one of their main skillsets. And one of the main focuses of the training of Thai boxers.

True, and I have nothing against some clinching, but too much of it is the real question I've posted. Just read the whole post, note: I have nothing against clinching, just when it's excessive.. i.e. Yodwicha Por Boonsit.
 
A lot of fights suck because of excessive clinching. When the fighters are working hard and firing knees the fights are great and they could stay locked up for the rest of the fight and I'll love it. When they're looking to just hold and throw each other down and control then it's boring and hard to stay interested.
 
It all depends. There are some guys who are really badass clinchers and can finish people with brutal knees, elbows, etc. I don't mind guys that actually try to destroy their opponents with a brutal clinch or exhaust them so that they can be knocked out with a punch or kick in the later rounds. I cannot stand guys that jump at every chance they get to clinch as a means to avoid punch-kick exchanges. There are a lot of Muay Thai practitioners, even in Lumpinee, with AWFUL boxing that do the same "stretch out the lead, tuck chin and cover with other hand, leap into a clinch ASAP" thing the moment someone suggests any aggression from outside clinch range. Reminds me so much of the MMA fighters that shoot for takedowns every time they're hit, except half the time it's a panic option rather than an intelligent way of neutralizing someone's offense.

I much rather prefer to see the kickboxing side of Muay Thai than the grappling side. There's just something a lot more stylish and dynamic to me about controlling space/distance/angles, using rhythm to mindfuck the opponent, etc than dominating someone with technical superiority. That's not to say you can't mindfuck someone in the clinch or exploit an opponent's bad habits, but there are just so many more ways to do that when striking from mid-outside ranges. I also feel that the more "kickboxerish" Nak Muays tend to hold their composure better when under pressure than the "clinchers/grappler-strikers" do.

I personally like guys that go in and out of every range, including clinching. They're always the most fluid with the most unpredictable use of options. Versatility wins it for me.

Also, let's be honest here. Grappling, etc becomes quite irrelevant if one can't get close enough to enter the clinch. We've seen it in Muay Thai where someone severely outpoints another before his opponent finally enters the swim, and even MMA has shown that slick outside fighters tend to dominate. Oh yeah, and Ali would rarely get hugged up back when he was young Clay and untouchable.
 
Last edited:
For me a lack of action anywhere can make fights less exciting, at a distance or in the clinch. Sometimes fighters tie up their opponent in a defensive manner to break the action but to me thats no worse than avoiding engaging from the outside (backing up constantly, not throwing any strikes, etc.). A boring fight is a boring fight...
 
A lot of fights suck because of excessive clinching. When the fighters are working hard and firing knees the fights are great and they could stay locked up for the rest of the fight and I'll love it. When they're looking to just hold and throw each other down and control then it's boring and hard to stay interested.

It's good too see I'm not completely alone in this regard. I was afraid of making such a post as this because of the possibility of coming across as not enjoying Muay Thai at it's core or something. I do notice that most of the time, referees break up the fighters when knees or even elbows are not being utilized, which has a lot too do with where my angle comes from.
 
Clinching as a panic-tactic or used in a manner similar to "lay and pray" in MMA just sucks.

It merely demonstrates a fighter's inability to punish or fight back when in danger.

I agree with one of the above posters that said that safety clinching is no different than someone who backs away from the outside and never throws strikes. That shit is lame too. It's totally different when guys like Saenchai, Petro, Mayweather, etc do it. They punish all day, despite being heavily defense-oriented.
 
Clinching as a panic-tactic or used in a manner similar to "lay and pray" in MMA just sucks.

It merely demonstrates a fighter's inability to punish or fight back when in danger.

I agree with one of the above posters that said that safety clinching is no different than someone who backs away from the outside and never throws strikes. That shit is lame too. It's totally different when guys like Saenchai, Petro, Mayweather, etc do it. They punish all day, despite being heavily defense-oriented.

Exactly. I mean, they possess a counter striking ability that of course always poses the threat of damage being done from a defensive angle as opposed too a purely offensive. It allows them too pick apart and outstrike their opponents, not just attack attack attack.
 
no but i train at a clinch/knee school with a kru who was paid to only clinch with guys in his camp so i love watching people who are skilled at it. i don't want to sound like one of "those guys" but there is some really intricate things going on while clinching and it should be appreciated.
 
no but i train at a clinch/knee school with a kru who was paid to only clinch with guys in his camp so i love watching people who are skilled at it. i don't want to sound like one of "those guys" but there is some really intricate things going on while clinching and it should be appreciated.

No duh. But there's a difference between not being able to appreciate clinching because you don't understand what's going on, and being irritated by someone who clinches as a desperate attempt to avoid all other forms of engagement, especially as a way to repeatedly stall the fight. There are too many panic-clinchers out there that grab and grasp for safety at the slightest feint.

Plus, I still believe the kickboxing element of Muay Thai is more intricate than the grappling component. Just so many more options with all the ranges, attacks, movement, etc. Clinching is a sophisticated skill set, no doubt, but it's no war dance.
 
I love it when there are knees, off balancing and throws. If guys try to rest in the clinch then it's boring. Off balancing is the best though
 
I like the clinch but like others said there has to be some action while clinching like knees and elbows and not just holding.
 
no but i train at a clinch/knee school with a kru who was paid to only clinch with guys in his camp so i love watching people who are skilled at it. i don't want to sound like one of "those guys" but there is some really intricate things going on while clinching and it should be appreciated.

Then it must partly be as I thought, which is having an un-trained eye. Perhaps once I have been training for a while like I plan too do I'll come to appreciate a lot more clinching.

Thanks for the input.
 
I love it when there are knees, off balancing and throws. If guys try to rest in the clinch then it's boring. Off balancing is the best though

I like too see a moderate amount of throws as well as clinch, as long as it doesn't dominate the fight. When they pull off a great throw at a precise moment fighters can look like geniuses, it's very entertaining, but if that's all they're doing, well...
 
For Thais it also has the mentality aspect which affect the amount they clinch in a fight. There's a unspoken rule how the pace of the 5 rounds should be. It's not unusual that the last two rounds are predominantly clinching. To heat up the crowd so they can shout "dtee! dtee!".
 
I like too see a moderate amount of throws as well as clinch, as long as it doesn't dominate the fight. When they pull off a great throw at a precise moment fighters can look like geniuses, it's very entertaining, but if that's all they're doing, well...

A fight that makes me laugh but can't find it online is Madsua vs John Wayne Parr where all he does is clinch and throw JWP to the floor every few seconds for 5 rounds. It wasn't the best just laughable.
 
Plus, I still believe the kickboxing element of Muay Thai is more intricate than the grappling component. Just so many more options with all the ranges, attacks, movement, etc. Clinching is a sophisticated skill set, no doubt, but it's no war dance.

I disagree. I've been with my kru for only a year and half and he's already shown me 4 different ways to clinch and he says there are more once you get more advanced. You have different ranges, attacks, and movements within clinches as well whether it's a straight knee, round knee, elbow, dirty boxing, or whatever you want to throw. Throws are cool too. Not only throwing a person to the mat but throwing them into the ropes and bouncing them off into your flying knee. THe details like where to put your chin, squeezing your opponents cheek into the top of your head (certain clinch positions) and making them feel like shit, round knees to the body and draining them for the next rounds, how to use your footwork to make them off balance, controlling your opponents shoulders to minimize their dirty boxing, and just feeling your opponent out in general. I feel like I could go all day and I haven't even talked about clinch defense or transitions and I still don't know shit about clinching.

Again, I'm really biased with the clinch though
 
I disagree. I've been with my kru for only a year and half and he's already shown me 4 different ways to clinch and he says there are more once you get more advanced. You have different ranges, attacks, and movements within clinches as well whether it's a straight knee, round knee, elbow, dirty boxing, or whatever you want to throw. Throws are cool too. Not only throwing a person to the mat but throwing them into the ropes and bouncing them off into your flying knee. THe details like where to put your chin, squeezing your opponents cheek into the top of your head (certain clinch positions) and making them feel like shit, round knees to the body and draining them for the next rounds, how to use your footwork to make them off balance, controlling your opponents shoulders to minimize their dirty boxing, and just feeling your opponent out in general. I feel like I could go all day and I haven't even talked about clinch defense or transitions and I still don't know shit about clinching.

Again, I'm really biased with the clinch though


I'm not denying that the clinch is one of the most sophisticated skill sets in the martial arts world, but there are just WAY more possibilities when you aren't merely attached to the opponent. Yes, there are mini-ranges and angles within the clinch, but you have even more possibilities outside of the clinch. So many ways to bait someone into doing what you want them to do, so many ways to psyche them out. A mere twitch of the shoulder or hip pivot could imply so many things to an opponent. Bouncing a knee low vs high could psyche an opponent out in completely different ways, and this can also vary based on the previous few seconds of a fight. Leaning forward slightly vs a lot.... taking a big step vs a small step. Even lowering your guard a little at mid-range could lead to a dozen different outcomes vs lowering guard a little at kick range, etc.

I just feel that the kickboxing element of Muay Thai has a dance/rhythm/flow element to it that cannot be duplicated in the clinch. High-level clinching is EXTREMELY technical and anyone to underestimate the potential of the clinch is as stupid as one could get. However, the moment you break from that inside range, there are SO many more options available. Hell, the rhythm even changes when the opponents are 4ft apart compared to just 3.

I can tell you now that boxing has a far more sophisticated movement game (angles, footwork, spacing games, rhythm, etc) than Muay Thai.. just because it's been developed and refined for over a century. Let's name perhaps the three greatest boxers of all time: SRR, Ali, SRL. They were all extremely witty in and out, and are renown for the fact that you could never get close to them as often as you'd like, and that they were almost unpredictable in their intentions because of how they dominated options with movement and timing. And know what? The best Nak Muays are those that can fuck with the opponent's head by dancing around, being unpredictable with how they APPROACH the opponent, the way they control the mind and dictate the offensive and defensive options of an opponent, etc. There's a damn good reason why Samart Payakaroon was/is considered the best Nak Muay in history, Saenchai the best presently, etc. Elite clinchers are heavily respected, but they don't shine in the same way that their fluid, rhythmic "striker" counterparts do.

Clinching is beautiful because it's soooo technically demanding. Yet the kickboxing element of Muay Thai is a crazy blend of precise distance recognition skills, intuition and mind-control, dance-like elements (rhythm, footwork, angles and all other forms of movement), exploiting the ring/arena, and of course.... technique.

Also, remember that clinching takes a dive if you can't get a chance to swim. Loses all relevance when the effective range is not accessible.

I just don't think a Dieselnoi stacks up to someone who can murder competition with an intelligent war-dance.


Perhaps I'm biased against clinching. But it seems that in boxing, kickboxing, Muay Thai, and even MMA, the man who wins is he who can neutralize an opponent's threat while still being a threat himself. Doing this from the outside is far more efficient/safe than taking risks trying to get in (yeah, you can "punish" an ineffective strike with a grapple-opener, but in doing so you're also far more open than punishing with a counterstrike).
 
Last edited:
Nothing against clinching at all, as long as they're doing something in the clinch. Not stalling or holding on because they're tired
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,262,867
Messages
57,191,492
Members
175,575
Latest member
b0sem
Back
Top