- Joined
- Jun 11, 2019
- Messages
- 448
- Reaction score
- 542
Artem Lobov did
The first fight was a pure standup fight too, until McGregor realized was gonna lose either way so he turned into a panic wrestlerMcgregor won a decision in a pure standup fight, and it was pretty clear.
You cant argue diaz won 3 rounds, thats clear imo. His best round was the third.It wasn't even "pretty clear" to the judges.
Outstruck and outlanded are different because of the damage and effects of the strikes. So i disagree with saying "outstruck"Yes, but Diaz landed 2 more strikes, so he outstruck McGregor. Conor did land the more damaging shots of course, I'm not arguing that.
Diaz was the one picking himself up off the ground multiple times.It wasn't even "pretty clear" to the judges.
Well using your logic, I could also make the case that if that fight had gone for 1 more round, Conor would have either been TKO'd or subbed. He BARELY won that fight, and that was clear.Outstruck and outlanded are different because of the damage and effects of the strikes. So i disagree with saying "outstruck"
True - it is troublesome to compare different eras of fighters (or any participants of any sport) against their contemporaries. Times change my friends and you too will get old. And when you do you'll remember a time when fighters you watched were the greatest.Don't think there is such a thing as best.
Too many stuff to take into consideration like height, weight, limb length, technique, speed, power...
But I think we can safely say that Conor is up there with the best of them.
Not until he gassedNate Diaz outstruck McGregor in both fights.
http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/648396cc751c730d
http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/4ace70bff9debdfb
Oh, I absolutely can argue and have done so many times. But I'm not going to derail this thread by doing so.You cant argue diaz won 3 rounds, thats clear imo. His best round was the third.