- Joined
- Dec 2, 2016
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 60
Fedor's biggest comp at the time was Big Nog and beat him twice. DC biggest comp was/is Jon Jones and lost to him twice.
Actually, I’d love to see Stipe vs Sergei.
They would have matched up pretty well.
Jones is way better than both Fedor and Cormier. Not a fair comparison.Fedor's biggest comp at the time was Big Nog and beat him twice. DC biggest comp was/is Jon Jones and lost to him twice.
MMATH LMAO
too easy.
1st of all, Babalu was a HW back then when he started.
In this fight he was around 229 lbs IIRC while Fedor, lighter @ 227 lbs.
Moreover, Arona...A LHW in this fight, @ 202 lbs, but you´re talkin about someone who would manhandle Kerr (!) a few yrs later @ ADCC.
On a sidenote, the Arona fight was close, was ruled a Majority Draw at the end of the 2nd Round [Draw x 2 + 1 Judge gave it to Arona]. Arona had more ground controle, but Fedor had more submission attempts... It is what it is.
Now talkin´ about the roster of this tournament:
Rings: King of Kings 2000 Block A
> you had guys like:
Minotau, Tamura, Couture,Babalu, Valentijn Overeem, Horn,Labasanov,Suren Balachinskiy (was considered
better than Fedor at that time, beat him twice in sambo) etc
Rings: King of Kings 2000 Block B
> Fedor, TK, Ilyukhin, Arona,Kopylov etc
DC wasn't getting punched and kicked in the head in his 20s
Fight age almakes a difference
tbh I dont think you know what you´re talkin´ about.Stil not seeing the era he dominated before??
Are you insinuating that MMA has not evolved in 20 years?? That Block B was the equivolent of DC's opponents today??
FYI every aspect of the sport has evolved, from amateur wrestling to especially BJJ, to especially and most irrelevant how those 2 are trained together today.
To insinuate tjat the 1 dimensional sport of the 90's is that same as today is a fucking joke. And both you guys should feel a little bit dumber for even comparing it.
Fedor is incedibly overrated, great at his time, but he dominated a single era, and the game caught up to him fairly quiclky.
1 guy was getting KO'd by MW's by the age 33 the other becams a 2 division champ at age 39.
tbh I dont think you know what you´re talkin´ about.
And since u have no longer any technical sound argument, you´re now spittin´clichés, and recycling BS u heard from others.
To make it short, listen to Hume, he knows much more than those who taught u these clichés:
tbh I already understood that u are an idiot, so jus´ check what Hume has to say and stop losing my time.Lol yes because you can be just as successful training in a single discipline, or even just 2 right??
The training protocols from the 90's hasnt changed at all, the mma school back then still is the same thing...
You sir are a baffoon
tbh I dont think you know what you´re talkin´ about.
And since u have no longer any technical sound argument, you´re now spittin´clichés, and recycling BS u heard from others.
To make it short, listen to Hume, he knows much more than those who taught u these clichés: