DHS stonewalls Congress on

second sight

We have officially entered the "Age of Deception"
@Silver
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
14,495
Reaction score
3,142
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is refusing to answer Congress
 
This is why i trust the DHS with all the God like powers they have. They really seem to have their shit together.

But seriously, It seems like every week there is a new scandal, one which they previously lied to us about. One can only wonder what other skeletons they have hiding if someone was to do a deep investigation on the FEDS/DHS.
 
This is why i trust the DHS with all the God like powers they have. They really seem to have their shit together.

But seriously, It seems like every week there is a new scandal, one which they previously lied to us about. One can only wonder what other skeletons they have hiding if someone was to do a deep investigation on the FEDS/DHS.

this stuff is intentional and it's not an isolated incident


http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qa...terrorists-country-refugees/story?id=20931131
 
Maybe yes, maybe no.
Would be nice to look into this to see what exactly is going on.
Like i said in my earlier post. every time someone bothers to do any investigation it seems like they find a legit scandal almost every time. If we find out that the FEDS are breaking the law abusing their power, or covering something up 99/100 times when we bother looking into what they're really doing, then i would assume a legit investigation would probaly turn up something serious.
 
why is this falling off the first page with no responses?
 
if it's happened more than once, it's not an isolated incident
 
if it's happened more than once, it's not an isolated incident

That doesn't make it intentional.

70,000 Iraqi war refuges resettled in this country and a few are former AQ and slipped through after claiming refuge status, what a fucking surprise.
 
the first article clearly said it was intentional, the second article shows this isn't the first time it's happened

I didn't say the second article was intentional
 
the first article clearly said it was intentional, the second article shows this isn't the first time it's happened

It still clearly states that it is unintentional.

You're just trolling here, trying to stir up shit.

Let the facts speak for themselves.
 
The specific emails released by Grassley detail an argument over the admittance to the United States of one alleged Muslim Brotherhood official who has been tied to Hamas, Hezbollah, and other terror groups.
While the individual in question had his name blacked out in the redacted emails, the Free Beacon reported that the person referenced is Jamal Badawi, a Canadian Islamist leader who has praised suicide bombing and is close to Hamas and Hezbollah.

 
Back
Top