fat_wilhelm said:Ass to grass means exactly what it sounds like.
Nope.rickdog said:I do heavy back squats to parallel and since i'm practicing for Oly lifting I do my front squats to grass. No, it is not necessary to squat deep. Read the study (i think it was Rkjd12 put out on it) In complete layman terms it said the same muscles were stimulated and that the guys not going as deep were able to use heavier weights while getting the same benefits out of the movement.
Help me out here if you read the study or do a search on it.
rickdog said:I do heavy back squats to parallel and since i'm practicing for Oly lifting I do my front squats to grass. No, it is not necessary to squat deep. Read the study (i think it was Rkjd12 put out on it) In complete layman terms it said the same muscles were stimulated and that the guys not going as deep were able to use heavier weights while getting the same benefits out of the movement.
Help me out here if you read the study or do a search on it.
Rjkd12 said:Don't rip on bodybuilders who do 1/4 squats. EMG work has shown that the only difference in activation of muscle is as you go lower your glutes are activated more, and hamstring and quad activation are the same. So, if you want maximum stimulation of the hams and quads, its better to do a 1/4 squat with a lot more weight than to go ass to the grass. Now, I think bodybuilders should do full squats, but heavy short range partials do have their place. Granted probably 50% of the guys are doing it wrong, just don't assume everyone doing it is a moron.
For MMA, who cares about the weight (as Urban says, just make sure its more than before), and go ass to the grass. If you are concerned about how much harder it is, add a few bands or chains to make the motion at the top of the lift harder.
rickdog said:I do heavy back squats to parallel and since i'm practicing for Oly lifting I do my front squats to grass. No, it is not necessary to squat deep. Read the study (i think it was Rkjd12 put out on it) In complete layman terms it said the same muscles were stimulated and that the guys not going as deep were able to use heavier weights while getting the same benefits out of the movement.
Help me out here if you read the study or do a search on it.
It's not bullshitJudoka_ said:1/4 squats are bullshit and should only be used for the jerk
the reason you go ass to grass and do it olympic style is to get all the muscles around the knee and the quad to be explosive and well built as well as your CORE
the front squat is for your full clean assitance and CORE your olympic back squat is also for your CORE
quater squats are gay and you should not use them.
if your a bodybuilder your probably a homo anyways so try not to listen to bodybuilders when its a forum about STRENGTH and POWER whats the point when all they do is train for cosmetical purposes
Ted-P said:It's not bullshit
They have their place.
Judoka_ said:im an olympic lifter. who better to know about squats then oly lifters?
fat_wilhelm said:If you still feel like flying off the handle, however, at least clean up your posts. They're painful as hell to read.
fat_wilhelm said:Ummm... how about a power lifter? Last I heard, squats were one of the three lifts that are actually performed in competition.
I don't necessarily disagree w/ what you've said, but chill out, man. You're jumping around, suggesting people are "tards" and boasting that you're an olympic lifter in multiple threads. I'm pretty sure no one's impressed.
Just discuss. It'll be much more welcome. If you still feel like flying off the handle, however, at least clean up your posts. They're painful as hell to read.
Judoka_ said:but olympic lifters are just superior when it comes to squatting power its true