Death Penalty... For or against?

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by Jack Handy jr, Aug 9, 2015.

  1. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
    I know I'm not breaking any new thread ground with this one. so no I didn't use the search function.

    Just wanted to get you guys take on the James Holmes Verdict. I wanted him to get the Death Penalty because all the evidence showed that he wasn't "crazy" just a heartless evil killer.

    But I got to thinking ....If I was on Holmes jury would I really have voted for him to be executed?

    What say you? and what's your stance on Capital punishment for people like Holmes in general.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/08/0...ath-penalty-for-theater-shooter-james-holmes/
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2015
  2. LogicalInsanity

    LogicalInsanity Co-Founder of SDLS (Sexual Deviant Leftist Scum)

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2012
    Messages:
    31,681
    Likes Received:
    31,659
    Too expensive.

    Doesn't deter murder

    Too imperfect. ( innocent people get executed)

    Too inefficient. ( took 12 years to execute mcveigh)

    As a Vulcan would say, it's illogical.
     
  3. K1levelgrappler

    K1levelgrappler Black Belt

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2015
    Messages:
    5,166
    Likes Received:
    14,771
    I'm not willing to sacrifice even a single innocent life just to satiate peoples desire for revenge. It's a backwards and indefensible practice and if you look around the world at who's doing it we should be embarrassed to be in such company.
     
  4. KnightTemplar

    KnightTemplar Halloween Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    37,816
    Likes Received:
    45,934
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    In cases like Holmes, yes, I'd support the death penalty. For the, "average" murderer, no way. Too many mistakes have been made. I would only support the death penalty in cases were guilt has been proven not beyond reasonable but any doubt.
     
  5. HereticBD

    HereticBD Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    44,325
    Likes Received:
    70,606
    Location:
    In the hearts and minds of everyone
    100% for the death penalty in cases where guilt is 100%.
     
  6. MANIAC123

    MANIAC123 Yolo Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    13,170
    Likes Received:
    1,248
    Against.

    Life in prison is a worse punishment in my opinion. It is also too expensive and government should not decide when or when not to kill people.
     
  7. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
    yeah man I think that's my biggest issue with it esp with the innocence project finding so many dudes were wrongfully convicted
     
  8. jamiehunter

    jamiehunter Double Yellow Card Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2014
    Messages:
    4,752
    Likes Received:
    554
    I'd be for it in cases where it's 100% the person is guilty if it wasn't for the cost to execute somebody and how long it takes.
     
  9. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
    You know man I followed that case pretty closely and my craphouse psychologist take on Holmes was that this whole thing was calculated. I think he was only seeing a shrink to validate his "I'm crazy" defense after he did what he meticulously calculated, and designed to do. which was a mass killing.

    and then for him to not off himself like most of these mass shooters and just sit there waiting to be arrested...yeah that s.o.b was crazy but not Adam lanza crazy he was just evil and imo opinion needs to be put down
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2015
  10. PolishHeadlock

    PolishHeadlock Putin Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    42,412
    Likes Received:
    38,280
    Location:
    Phila fucking delphia
    I don't have a problem with it morally but it doesn't make sense pragmatically.
     
  11. oldshadow

    oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    28,973
    Likes Received:
    15,690
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    For it in certain cases and this most likely would be one of them.
     
  12. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
    man I 'm pretty much the same way but this innocence project is finding a lil too much wrong doing or shotty detective work. I think if it's a capital offence DNA evidence should be the delineating factor whether to state sanction off a guy. eye witnesses, coerced confessions, just too much iffy work in a lot of these convictions.

    http://www.innocenceproject.org/cases-false-imprisonment
     
  13. picasso

    picasso Blue Belt

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    27
    Against. Too much of a chance innocent people could (and have been) put to death.

    It should be considered for the killings of police/detectives, witnesses, or inmates/correctional officers. They are the only times it may possibly be considered a deterrent.
     
  14. ripskater

    ripskater Guest

    The death penalty is more humane than locking them up for life.

    Also, it gives the accused the chance to get right with God before his time is up.
     
  15. 7437

    7437 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2013
    Messages:
    24,321
    Likes Received:
    21,740
    Not a good idea, DNA evidence gets faked to get convictions all the time.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2004/may/19/nation/na-briefs19.4
     
  16. HelloJapan

    HelloJapan Talking loud and saying nothing. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2014
    Messages:
    17,748
    Likes Received:
    28,789
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Decent summation imo.

    Only in two cases do i believe in it:

    1) Psychopaths
    2) Pedophiles

    Next to zero effective treatment with these two criminal types.
     
  17. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
    yeah Rip kinda reminds me of when Johnny Utah finally slapped the cuffs on Bodie "you know I cant handle a cage man!"

    seriously I couldn't do life without the possibility of parole. that's why I watch all the First 48, CSI, and CSI new Orleans I can find.

    If I ever have to ghost somebody I want to get away with it:cool:.
     
  18. HereticBD

    HereticBD Titanium Belt

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    44,325
    Likes Received:
    70,606
    Location:
    In the hearts and minds of everyone
    Oh' yeah, but when I say 100% I mean 100% which there is still such a thing as. It would be a very small pool of people. Holmes for instance, should be killed.
     
  19. Jack Handy jr

    Jack Handy jr Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2014
    Messages:
    12,098
    Likes Received:
    5,956
    Location:
    LV-426
  20. TSO

    TSO Cookie monster belt

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    14,595
    Likes Received:
    7,122
    Location:
    Kings Landing
    Only because of the endless bureaucracy. Killing can be as cheap as pushing someone off a cliff. Cliffs are free.

    It sure does. Most murders are committed by people that have done so more than once. Killing them prevents 100% recidivism rates.

    These are really critiques of the current system than they are arguments against it.

    Actually logic would dictate that if you have a way of stopping someone from killing again, than it's perfectly logical to take that action. Killing that person being 100% effective at doing this is the most logical solution to the given problem.

    The problem with vulcan "logic" is that Roddenberry didn't understand logic, so couldn't write them as having it effectively as seen by his removal of emotion which in and of itself is illogical.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.